Literature DB >> 19404687

Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation device for the thoracic spine.

Michio Hongo1, Brice Ilharreborde, Ralph E Gay, Chunfeng Zhao, Kristin D Zhao, Lawrence J Berglund, Mark Zobitz, Kai-Nan An.   

Abstract

The technology used in surgery for spinal deformity has progressed rapidly in recent years. Commonly used fixation techniques may include monofilament wires, sublaminar wires and cables, and pedicle screws. Unfortunately, neurological complications can occur with all of these, compromising the patients' health and quality of life. Recently, an alternative fixation technique using a metal clamp and polyester belt was developed to replace hooks and sublaminar wiring in scoliosis surgery. The goal of this study was to compare the pull-out strength of this new construct with sublaminar wiring, laminar hooks and pedicle screws. Forty thoracic vertebrae from five fresh frozen human thoracic spines (T5-12) were divided into five groups (8 per group), such that BMD values, pedicle diameter, and vertebral levels were equally distributed. They were then potted in polymethylmethacrylate and anchored with metal screws and polyethylene bands. One of five fixation methods was applied to the right side of the vertebra in each group: Pedicle screw, sublaminar belt with clamp, figure-8 belt with clamp, sublaminar wire, or laminar hook. Pull-out strength was then assessed using a custom jig in a servohydraulic tester. The mean failure load of the pedicle screw group was significantly larger than that of the figure-8 clamp (P = 0.001), sublaminar belt (0.0172), and sublaminar wire groups (P = 0.04) with no significant difference in pull-out strength between the latter three constructs. The most common mode of failure was the fracture of the pedicle. BMD was significantly correlated with failure load only in the figure-8 clamp and pedicle screw constructs. Only the pedicle screw had a statistically significant higher failure load than the sublaminar clamp. The sublaminar method of applying the belt and clamp device was superior to the figure-8 method. The sublaminar belt and clamp construct compared favorably to the traditional methods of sublaminar wires and laminar hooks, and should be considered as an alternative fixation device in the thoracic spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19404687      PMCID: PMC2899515          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0999-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

1.  Complications associated with pedicle screws.

Authors:  J E Lonstein; F Denis; J H Perra; M R Pinto; M D Smith; R B Winter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders.

Authors:  R W Gaines
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Biomechanical study and digital modeling of traction resistance in posterior thoracic implants.

Authors:  Louis Etienne Gayet; Pierre Pries; Hamid Hamcha; Jean-Pierre Clarac; Jacques Texereau
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Axial and tangential fixation strength of pedicle screws versus hooks in the thoracic spine in relation to bone mineral density.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Thomas Link; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Triangulated pedicle screw construct technique and pull-out strength of conical and cylindrical screws.

Authors:  A Ono; M D Brown; L L Latta; E L Milne; D C Holmes
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2001-08

6.  Late complications due to wire breakage in segmental spinal instrumentation. Report of two cases.

Authors:  T N Bernard; C E Johnston; J M Roberts; S W Burke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Segmental spinal instrumentation for correction of scoliosis.

Authors:  E R Luque
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation.

Authors:  F P Magerl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Cauda equina compression due to a laminar hook: A late complication of posterior instrumentation in scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  M Rittmeister; K Leyendecker; A Kurth; E Schmitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Postoperative neurological deficits in segmental spinal instrumentation. A study using spinal cord monitoring.

Authors:  R G Wilber; G H Thompson; J W Shaffer; R H Brown; C L Nash
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  16 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of posterior lumbar dynamic stabilization: an in vitro comparison between Universal Clamp and Wallis systems.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Miranda N Shaw; Lawrence J Berglund; Kristin D Zhao; Ralph E Gay; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Use of the Universal Clamp for deformity correction and as an adjunct to fusion: preliminary results in scoliosis.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Jouve; Jérôme Sales de Gauzy; Benjamin Blondel; Franck Launay; Franck Accadbled; Gérard Bollini
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Type V osteogenesis imperfecta undergoing surgical correction for scoliosis" by M. Jones et al. (Eur Spine J; 2018: doi 10.1007/s00586-018-5465-8).

Authors:  C Birkenmaier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Failure of cement-augmented pedicle screws in the osteoporotic spine: a case report.

Authors:  Addisu Mesfin; Christopher B Komanski; A Jay Khanna
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

5.  Sublaminar bands: are they safe?

Authors:  E Polirsztok; M Gavaret; T Gsell; I Suprano; E Choufani; G Bollini; Jean-Luc Jouve
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a review of literature.

Authors:  U J Spiegl; C Josten; B M Devitt; C-E Heyde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Innovation of Surgical Techniques for Screw Fixation in Patients with Osteoporotic Spine.

Authors:  Haruo Kanno; Yoshito Onoda; Ko Hashimoto; Toshimi Aizawa; Hiroshi Ozawa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  Use of the Universal Clamp in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jérôme Sales de Gauzy; Jean-Luc Jouve; Brice Ilharreborde; Benjamin Blondel; Franck Accadbled; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Currently Adopted Criteria for Pedicle Screw Diameter Selection.

Authors:  Giovanni F Solitro; Keith Whitlock; Farid Amirouche; Ankit I Mehta; Annie McDonnell
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

10.  Novel augmentation technique of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using hydroxyapatite granules in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Haruo Kanno; Toshimi Aizawa; Ko Hashimoto; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.