Literature DB >> 15844740

Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses.

Terence W Picton1, Andrew Dimitrijevic, Maria-Cecilia Perez-Abalo, Patricia Van Roon.   

Abstract

Human auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) were recorded using stimulus rates of 78-95 Hz in normal young subjects, in elderly subjects with relatively normal hearing, and in elderly subjects with sensorineural hearing impairment. Amplitude-intensity functions calculated relative to actual sensory thresholds (sensation level or SL) showed that amplitudes increased as stimulus intensity increased. In the hearing-impaired subjects this increase was more rapid at intensities just above threshold ("electrophysiological recruitment") than at higher intensities where the increase was similar to that seen in normal subjects. The thresholds in dB SL for recognizing an ASSR and the intersubject variability of these thresholds decreased with increasing recording time and were lower in the hearing impaired compared to the normal subjects. After 9.8 minutes of recording, the average ASSR thresholds (and standard deviations) were 12.6 +/- 8.7 in the normal subjects, 12.4 +/- 11.9 dB in the normal elderly, and 3.6 +/- 13.5 dB SL in the hearing-impaired subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15844740     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16.3.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  30 in total

1.  [On the terminology of auditory steady-state responses. What differentiates steady-state and transient potentials?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Towards an optimal paradigm for intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring with auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  Stefan Rampp; Leonhard Rensch; Sebastian Simmermacher; Torsten Rahne; Christian Strauss; Julian Prell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Auditory steady-state responses for estimating moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; Hettie Erasmus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Audiometric thresholds estimated by auditory steady-state responses. Influence of EEG amplitude and test duration on accuracy].

Authors:  R Mühler; T Rahne
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Ali Ozdek; Mahmut Karacay; Guleser Saylam; Emel Tatar; Nurdan Aygener; Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Frequency characteristics of contralateral sound suppression of 40-Hz auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Hiromichi Kiyokawa; Tetsuaki Kawase; Hidetoshi Oshima; Atsuko Maki; Toshimitsu Kobayashi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Validity of correction factors applied to auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in normal hearing adults in chartr EP system.

Authors:  Zahra Ghasemahmad; Saeid Farahani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  The Accuracy of Envelope Following Responses in Predicting Speech Audibility.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Jen Birstler; Adrienne Harrison; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Speech Intelligibility Predicted from Neural Entrainment of the Speech Envelope.

Authors:  Jonas Vanthornhout; Lien Decruy; Jan Wouters; Jonathan Z Simon; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-20

10.  Auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; Shamim Ebrahim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.