Literature DB >> 17273838

Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies.

Konrad Seller1, Dieter Wahl, Alexander Wild, Rüdiger Krauspe, Erich Schneider, Berend Linke.   

Abstract

A lot of new implant devices for spine surgery are coming onto the market, in which vertebral screws play a fundamental role. The new screws developed for surgery of spine deformities have to be compared to established systems. A biomechanical in vitro study was designed to assess the bone-screw interface fixation strength of seven different screws used for correction of scoliosis in spine surgery. The objectives of the current study were twofold: (1) to evaluate the initial strength at the bone-screw interface of newly developed vertebral screws (Universal Spine System II) compared to established systems (product comparison) and (2) to evaluate the influence of screw design, screw diameter, screw length and bone mineral density on pullout strength. Fifty-six calf vertebral bodies were instrumented with seven different screws (USS II anterior 8.0 mm, USS II posterior 6.2 mm, KASS 6.25 mm, USS II anterior 6.2 mm, USS II posterior 5.2 mm, USS 6.0 mm, USS 5.0 mm). Bone mineral density (BMD) was determined by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Failure in axial pullout was tested using a displacement-controlled universal test machine. USS II anterior 8.0 mm showed higher pullout strength than all other screws. The difference constituted a tendency (P = 0.108) when compared to USS II posterior 6.2 mm (+19%) and was significant in comparison to the other screws (+30 to +55%, P < 0.002). USS II posterior 6.2 mm showed significantly higher pullout strength than USS 5.0 mm (+30%, P = 0.014). The other screws did not differ significantly in pullout strength. Pullout strength correlated significantly with BMD (P = 0.0015) and vertebral body width/screw length (P < 0.001). The newly developed screws for spine surgery (USS II) show higher pullout strength when compared to established systems. Screw design had no significant influence on pullout force in vertebral body screws, but outer diameter of the screw, screw length and BMD are good predictors of pullout resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17273838      PMCID: PMC2219666          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0307-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  57 in total

1.  Screw fixation to the posterior cortical shell does not influence peak torque and pullout in anterior cervical plating.

Authors:  T Pitzen; D Barbier; F Tintinger; W I Steudel; M Strowitzki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical properties of expander compared with conventional screws.

Authors:  Aziz Rassi-Neto; Antonio Shimano
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  [MACS-TL polyaxial screw XL. A new concept for increasing stability of ventral spondylodesis in the presence of dorsal injuries].

Authors:  M Schultheiss; H J Wilke; L Claes; L Kinzl; E Hartwig
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Effectiveness of cemented rescue screws for anterior cervical plate fixation.

Authors:  Tobias Rainer Pitzen; Jörg Drumm; Bernhard Bruchmann; Dragos Doru Barbier; Wolf-Ingo Steudel
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-01

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of anterior spinal instrumentation systems for scoliosis: in vitro fatigue simulation.

Authors:  N Shimamoto; Y Kotani; Y Shono; K Kadoya; K Abumi; K Kaneda; A Minami
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Augmentation of anterior vertebral body screw fixation by an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute.

Authors:  B Bai; F J Kummer; J Spivak
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.

Authors:  Maximilian Reinhold; Karsten Schwieger; Joerg Goldhahn; Berend Linke; Christian Knop; Michael Blauth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  [MAC-TL twin screw. A new thoracoscopic implantable stabilization system for treatment of vertebral fractures--implant design, implantation technique and in vitro testing].

Authors:  M Schultheiss; H J Wilke; L Claes; L Kinzl; E Hartwig
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  A biomechanical study of the cortex-anchorage vertebral screw.

Authors:  Li-Chun Lin; Hsiang-Ho Chen; Su-Ping Sun
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Anterior fixation in the osteoporotic spine: cut-out and pullout characteristics of implants.

Authors:  Stephen J Ferguson; Florian Winkler; Lutz-P Nolte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  10 in total

1.  Experimentally induced incomplete burst fractures - a novel technique for calf and human specimens.

Authors:  René Hartensuer; Adam Gasch; Dominic Gehweiler; Steffen Schanz; Martin Schulze; Lars Matuszewski; Martin Langer; Michael J Raschke; Thomas Vordemvenne
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 2.  [Degeneration and osteoporosis of the spine. Is there a modified procedure?].

Authors:  K-S Delank; M Röllinghoff; K Eysel-Gosepath; R Sobottke; P Eysel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Operative treatment of 733 patients with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries: comprehensive results from the second, prospective, Internet-based multicenter study of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thorax and lumbar spine. Part II: surgical treatment and radiological findings].

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Unilateral Limited Laminectomy for Debridement to Treat Localized Short-Segment Lumbosacral Spinal Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Miao Li; Jianjun Huang; Jinbiao Chen; Shaohua Liu; Zhansheng Deng; Jianzhong Hu; Yong Cao; Tianding Wu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  Effect of the pilot hole preparation on the anchorage of pedicle screws.

Authors:  Gustavo Silva Abrahão; Rodrigo César Rosa; Rodrigo Okubo; Antônio Carlos Shimano
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.513

7.  In vitro biomechanical study of pedicle screw pull-out strength based on different screw path preparation techniques.

Authors:  Mark Moldavsky; Kanaan Salloum; Brandon Bucklen; Saif Khalil; Jwalant S Mehta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Reliability of Hounsfield Unit for Assessing Asymmetrical Vertebral Bone Mass in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis.

Authors:  Lin-Yu Jin; Xin-Jin Su; Shuai Xu; Hai-Ying Liu; Xin-Feng Li
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-06-30

9.  Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system.

Authors:  Chu-Song Zhou; Yan-Fang Xu; Yu Zhang; Zhong Chen; Hai Lv
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  A novel entry point for pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Zhi-Feng Sun; Kai-Xiang Yang; Hong-Tao Chen; Tao Sui; Lei Yang; Da-Wei Ge; Jian Tang; Xiao-Jian Cao
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2018-03-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.