Literature DB >> 11547193

Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

F A Sweet1, L G Lenke, K H Bridwell, K M Blanke, J Whorton.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective clinical cases series.
OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate outcomes and critically review radiographic results and complications associated with single solid rod anterior spinal fusions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with 2-year minimum follow-up (range, 2-6 years).
METHODS: Ninety consecutive patients at a single institution with thoracic (n = 43) or thoracolumbar/lumbar (n = 47) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were treated by one of two surgeons with a similar anterior surgical technique using rib autograft, intradiscal structural (Harms) cages placed below T12, and anterior single solid rod convex compressive instrumentation. The patients were evaluated prospectively with the Scoliosis Research Society outcome instrument and upright radiographs before surgery and minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS (RADIOGRAPHIC): The average coronal correction of thoracic curves was from 55 degrees to 29 degrees (47%). The average correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves was from 50 degrees to 15 degrees (70%). In the sagittal plane, kyphosis was improved in thoracic fusions from 23 degrees to 30 degrees (T5-T12) and lordosis maintained in thoracolumbar/lumbar fusions at -58 degrees (T12-sacrum). Five patients (5.5%) developed a pseudarthrosis, four with implant failure. Three of five required a posterior fusion for a reoperation rate of 3.3%. The fourth and fifth patients were asymptomatic and appeared fused at the 2-year follow-up, with minimal loss of correction. Common risk factors for pseudarthrosis were smoking (4 of 5), weight >70 kg (4 of 5), and for thoracic pseudarthrosis, hyperkyphosis >40 degrees T5-T12 (2 of 3). RESULTS (CLINICAL OUTCOME): Scoliosis Research Society domain average scores were improved for function, pain, and self-image (P < 0.01). With the Scoliosis Research Society satisfaction domain, 88% responded that they were satisfied with their results and 89% would undergo the same treatment again. Four of five patients with pseudarthrosis did not have statistically significant lower final Scoliosis Research Society scores than those with solid fusions (93 vs. 97, P = 0.18).
CONCLUSION: Anterior instrumented fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a single solid rod had good radiographic and clinical outcomes. Consideration should be given to alternate techniques in larger adolescents (>70 kg) with thoracic hyperkyphosis (>40 degrees ), and smoking should be avoided. Poor radiographic outcomes did not correlate with final Scoliosis Research Society scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11547193     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200109150-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  27 in total

1.  Anterior instrumentation (dual screws single rod system) for the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in the lumbar area: a prospective study on 33 adolescents and young adults, based on a new system of classification.

Authors:  Bergoin Maurice
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Selective thoracic fusion in AIS curves: the definition of target outcomes improves the prediction of spontaneous lumbar curve correction (SLCC).

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Heidrun Albrecht; Rene Schmidt; Juliane Zenner; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Single- versus dual-rod anterior instrumentation of thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Mithun Nambiar; Yi Yang; Susan Liew; Peter L Turner; Ian P Torode
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Pull-out strength of the suprapedicle claw construct: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Abdulrazzaq Alobaid; Vincent Arlet; Andre Busato; Thomas Steffen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Spontaneous lumbar curve correction in selective anterior instrumentation and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis of Lenke type C.

Authors:  Ulf Liljenqvist; Henry Halm; Viola Bullmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Radiographic evaluation of selective anterior thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Bingfang Zeng; Jianguang Xu; Hua Chen; Tao Zhang; Wei Zhou; Weiqing Kong; Yishan Fu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Retrospective analysis of anterior correction and fusion for adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: the relationship between preserving mobile segments and trunk balance.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Ming Li; Xiao-Dong Zhu; Xu-Hui Zhou; Hua-Jiang Chen; Xin-Wei Wang; Peng Shi; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Comparison of combined anterior-posterior approach versus posterior-only approach in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zihao Chen; Limin Rong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Correction of flexible thoracic scoliosis below 65 degrees--a radiological comparison of anterior versus posterior segmental instrumentation applied to similar curves.

Authors:  Tomasz Kotwicki; Jean Dubousset; Jean-Paul Padovani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Criteria for successful correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in AIS patients: results of risk model calculations using target outcomes and failure analysis.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.