Literature DB >> 1582680

Chlamydial antigen detection in urine samples by immunofluorescence tests.

A Stary1, M Genç, C Heller-Vitouch, P A Mårdh.   

Abstract

To investigate the diagnostic value of a direct immunofluorescence test (DIF-test), urethral samples and first catch urine (FCU) from 153 male patients attending an outpatient clinic for sexually transmitted diseases (STD) were studied. Of the male patients, 40 (26.1%) had a positive urethral culture, 39 (25.5%) had a positive urethral DIF-test, and 32 (20.9%) were positive in urine according to the DIF-test. The sensitivity and the specificity of the DIF-test in male urine specimens were 75% and 98.2%, respectively, as compared with the chlamydial culture, and 69.2% and 95.6%, respectively, as compared to the DIF-test of the urethral samples. Out of the positive urethral samples, 31% had less than 5 elementary bodies (EBs) and 41% greater than 10 EBs, detected by the DIF-test. The corresponding data for FCU were 47% and 22%, indicating a smaller number of chlamydiae in urine than in urethral samples. False negative results in the urine DIF-test were mostly observed in males with a low number of EBs in the urethra. The DIF-test was less sensitive for FCU than for urethral specimens. Therefore, urine DIF-tests cannot replace conventional methods for chlamydial diagnosis in symptomatic STD patients, but may be recommended when genital sampling is not possible and may serve as an important approach in the control of genital chlamydial infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1582680     DOI: 10.1007/bf01711077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  13 in total

1.  The value of urine samples from men with non-gonococcal urethritis for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  P E Hay; B J Thomas; C Gilchrist; H M Palmer; C B Gilroy; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-04

2.  Comparison of urethral swabs, urine, and urinary sediment for the isolation of Chlamydia.

Authors:  T F Smith; L A Weed
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections using antigen detection methods.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in urine as an alternative to swabs and cultures.

Authors:  M Chernesky; S Castriciano; J Sellors; I Stewart; I Cunningham; S Landis; W Seidelman; L Grant; C Devlin; J Mahony
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Quantitative aspects of chlamydial infection of the cervix.

Authors:  D Hobson; P Karayiannis; R E Byng; E Rees; I A Tait; J A Davies
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1980-06

6.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine collected from men and women attending a venereal clinic.

Authors:  M Genç; A Stary; S Bergman; P A Mårdh
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.205

7.  Culture versus direct specimen test: comparative study of infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in Viennese prostitutes.

Authors:  A Stary; W Kopp; W Gebhart; J Söltz-Szöts
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1985-08

8.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections by direct immunofluorescence staining of genital secretions. A multicenter trial.

Authors:  W E Stamm; H R Harrison; E R Alexander; L D Cles; M R Spence; T C Quinn
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in military personnel by urine testing.

Authors:  A Stary; K Steyrer; C Heller-Vitouch; I Müller; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.553

10.  Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women with urogenital symptoms.

Authors:  J Sorbie; M V O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  5 in total

1.  Non-invasive sampling for detection of genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in males utilising urinary leukocyte esterase tests and immunoassays.

Authors:  M A Domeika; M Bassiri; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D Jang; H Lee; J D Burczak; H Hu; J Sellors; S J Tomazic-Allen; J B Mahony
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men by polymerase chain reaction assay of first-catch urine.

Authors:  J E Bauwens; A M Clark; M J Loeffelholz; S A Herman; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  M Bassiri; H Y Hu; M A Domeika; J Burczak; L O Svensson; H H Lee; P A Mårdh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.