Literature DB >> 3084162

Diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections using antigen detection methods.

W E Stamm.   

Abstract

Rapid antigen detection methods have great potential value in managing sexually transmitted gonococcal and chlamydial infections. Ideally, such tests should be rapid, technically simple, inexpensive, accurate, and applicable to all sites of infection commonly sampled (cervix, urethra, pharynx). For gonorrhea, the Gram stain fulfills these criteria in men with symptomatic urethritis, but lacks sensitivity when used at other sites or in asymptomatic patients. Antigen detection for gonorrhea would thus be of greatest value in 1) the diagnosis of gonococcal cervical infections in women with mucopurulent cervicitis or pelvic inflammatory disease, 2) the diagnosis of gonococcal proctitis in homosexual men, and 3) in situations requiring lengthy specimen transport. Because culture confirmation of Chlamydia trachomatis infections is not widely available, antigen detection tests could be of great value in management of these infections. Major uses include 1) confirming infection in women with cervicitis, endometritis, and pelvic inflammatory disease; 2) screening for asymptomatic infections in high risk groups of women; and 3) confirmation of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in infants and in adult males. The currently available methods for diagnosis of gonococcal and chlamydial infection by antigen detection are reviewed herein. Continued experience with antigen detection tests in well defined populations having high and low risk of gonococcal and chlamydial infection is needed to more fully determine how best to utilize these assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3084162     DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(86)80047-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  8 in total

1.  Chlamydial antigen detection in urine samples by immunofluorescence tests.

Authors:  A Stary; M Genç; C Heller-Vitouch; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  The Hawaii Chlamydia Network Project: a successful program incorporating close intra-agency cooperation.

Authors:  A R Katz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Oral Chlamydia trachomatis in patients with established periodontitis.

Authors:  S G Reed; D E Lopatin; B Foxman; B A Burt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  False-positive Chlamydiazyme results during urine sediment analysis due to bacterial urinary tract infections.

Authors:  J Demaio; R S Boyd; R Rensi; A Clark
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Ligase chain reaction for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urogenital swabs.

Authors:  S Ching; H Lee; E W Hook; M R Jacobs; J Zenilman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Multicenter evaluation of the AntigEnz Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection.

Authors:  A Clark; W E Stamm; C Gaydos; L Welsh; T C Quinn; J Schachter; J Moncada
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Orally administered cefpodoxime proxetil for treatment of uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis in males: a dose-response study.

Authors:  E Novak; L M Paxton; H J Tubbs; L F Turner; C W Keck; J Yatsu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Chlamydia trachomatis as a Current Health Problem: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Rafaela Rodrigues; Carlos Sousa; Nuno Vale
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.