Literature DB >> 15824989

Identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in less than 1 hour during a hospital surveillance program.

Ann Huletsky1, Pierre Lebel, Francois J Picard, Marthe Bernier, Martin Gagnon, Nathalie Boucher, Michel G Bergeron.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has spread worldwide and is responsible for significant morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Control strategies to limit the emergence and spread of this organism rely on rapid and sensitive tests for detection of MRSA carriage. However, the standard surveillance culture method for detecting MRSA is labor intensive and time-consuming (2-3 days per procedure). There is thus a need for a rapid and accurate method to screen for MRSA carriage.
METHODS: We recently developed an easy-to-use real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay suitable for specific detection of MRSA in nasal specimens in <1 h. We studied the efficacy of our new PCR assay in routine screening for nasal MRSA carriage during a hospital surveillance program. A total of 331 nasal specimens obtained from 162 patients at risk for colonization were tested by both the standard mannitol agar culture method and our PCR assay.
RESULTS: The PCR assay detected MRSA in all 81 samples that were culture positive for MRSA. The PCR assay detected 4 additional MRSA-positive specimens, for a specificity of 98.4%, a positive predictive value of 95.3%, and a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: This novel PCR assay allows reliable identification of MRSA carriers in <1 h. This test should facilitate the efficacy of MRSA surveillance programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15824989     DOI: 10.1086/428579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  30 in total

Review 1.  Development and applications of photo-triggered theranostic agents.

Authors:  Prakash Rai; Srivalleesha Mallidi; Xiang Zheng; Ramtin Rahmanzadeh; Youssef Mir; Stefan Elrington; Ahmat Khurshid; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  Current diagnostic tools for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Julianna Kurlenda; Mariusz Grinholc
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Concurrent analysis of nose and groin swab specimens by the IDI-MRSA PCR assay is comparable to analysis by individual-specimen PCR and routine culture assays for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Emma J Bishop; Elizabeth A Grabsch; Susan A Ballard; Barrie Mayall; Shirley Xie; Rhea Martin; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of an enrichment broth-enhanced commercial PCR procedure versus bacteriological culture for separating non-colonized from suspected or colonized MRSA individuals.

Authors:  J H T Wagenvoort; M F H A van de Cruijs; C T M Meuwissen; J M H Gronenschild; E I G B De Brauwer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay on the SmartCycler real-time PCR platform for rapid detection of MRSA from screening specimens.

Authors:  A S Rossney; C M Herra; M M Fitzgibbon; P M Morgan; M J Lawrence; B O'Connell
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection: comparison of two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) with three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA) for use with infection-control swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; D Stark; B Lockwood; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Multicenter evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) test as a rapid screening method for detection of MRSA in nares.

Authors:  D M Wolk; E Picton; D Johnson; T Davis; P Pancholi; C C Ginocchio; S Finegold; D F Welch; M de Boer; D Fuller; M C Solomon; B Rogers; M S Mehta; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.

Authors:  A Tübbicke; C Hübner; A Kramer; N-O Hübner; S Fleßa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Impact of mecA gene testing and intervention by infectious disease clinical pharmacists on time to optimal antimicrobial therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia at a University Hospital.

Authors:  Peggy L Carver; Shu-Wen Lin; Daryl D DePestel; Duane W Newton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  MRSA detection: comparison of two molecular methods (BD GeneOhm PCR assay and Easy-Plex) with two selective MRSA agars (MRSA-ID and Oxoid MRSA) for nasal swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; Z Jennings; D Stark; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.