Literature DB >> 15823804

Dynamic visual acuity using "far" and "near" targets.

Brian T Peters1, Jacob J Bloomberg.   

Abstract

CONCLUSIONS: DVA may be useful for assessing the functional consequences of an impaired gaze stabilization mechanism or for testing the effectiveness of a rehabilitation paradigm. Because target distance influences the relative contributions of canal and otolith inputs, the ability to measure DVA at near and far viewing distances may also lead to tests that will independently assess canal and otolith function.
OBJECTIVE: To present and test a methodology that uses dynamic visual acuity (DVA) to assess the efficacy of compensatory gaze mechanisms during a functionally relevant activity that differentially measures canal and otolith function.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The effect of treadmill walking at a velocity of 1.79 m/s on subjects' visual acuity was assessed at each of two viewing distances. A custom-written threshold determination program was used to display Landolt C optotypes on a laptop computer screen during a "far" (4 m) target condition and on a micro-display for a "near" (50 cm) target condition. The walking acuity scores for each target distance were normalized by subtracting a corresponding acuity measure obtained while standing still on the treadmill belt.
RESULTS: As predicted by subjective reports of relative target motion, the decrease in visual acuity was significantly greater (p < 0.00001) for the near compared to the far condition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Center JSC; NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15823804     DOI: 10.1080/00016480410024631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  5 in total

1.  Effects of distance and duration on vertical dynamic visual acuity in screening healthy adults and people with vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Brian T Peters; Helen S Cohen; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Modeling locomotor dysfunction following spaceflight with Galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Steven T Moore; Hamish G MacDougall; Brian T Peters; Jacob J Bloomberg; Ian S Curthoys; Helen S Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Assessment of functional outcomes in patients with vestibular disorders after rehabilitation.

Authors:  Helen S Cohen
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.138

4.  Dynamic visual acuity testing for screening patients with vestibular impairments.

Authors:  Brian T Peters; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Helen S Cohen; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Bach
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.535

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.