Literature DB >> 23000614

Dynamic visual acuity testing for screening patients with vestibular impairments.

Brian T Peters1, Ajitkumar P Mulavara, Helen S Cohen, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, Jacob J Bloomberg.   

Abstract

Dynamic visual acuity (DVA) may be a useful indicator of the function of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) but most DVA tests involve active head motion in the yaw plane. During gait the passive, vertical VOR may be more relevant and passive testing would be less likely to elicit compensatory strategies. The goal of this study was to determine if testing dynamic visual acuity during passive vertical motion of the subject would differentiate normal subjects from patients with known vestibular disorders. Subjects, normals and patients who had been diagnosed with either unilateral vestibular weaknesses or were post-acoustic neuroma resections, sat in a chair that could oscillate vertically with the head either free or constrained with a cervical orthosis. They viewed a computer screen 2 m away that showed Landholt C optotypes in one of 8 spatial configurations and which ranged in size from 0.4 to 1.0 logMAR. They were tested while the chair was stationary and while it was moving. Scores were worse for both groups during the dynamic condition compared to the static condition. In the dynamic condition patients' scores were significantly worse than normals' scores. Younger and older age groups differed slightly but significantly; the sample size was too small to examine age differences by decade. The data suggest that many well-compensated patients have dynamic visual acuity that is as good as age-matched normals. Results of ROC analyses were only moderate, indicating that the differences between patients and normals were not strong enough, under the conditions tested, for this test to be useful for screening people to determine if they have vestibular disorders. Modifications of the test paradigm may make it more useful for screening potential patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23000614      PMCID: PMC3540818          DOI: 10.3233/VES-2012-0440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  19 in total

1.  Dynamic visual acuity during yaw rotation in normal and unilaterally vestibulopathic humans.

Authors:  J R Tian; I Shubayev; J L Demer
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Effect of viewing distance on the generation of vertical eye movements during locomotion.

Authors:  S T Moore; E Hirasaki; B Cohen; T Raphan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Complementary gain modifications of the cervico-ocular (COR) and angular vestibulo-ocular (aVOR) reflexes after canal plugging.

Authors:  Sergei B Yakushin; Olga V Kolesnikova; Bernard Cohen; Dmitri A Ogorodnikov; Jun-Ichi Suzuki; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; Theodore Raphan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Attachment of the utricular and saccular maculae to the temporal bone.

Authors:  Hilal Uzun-Coruhlu; Ian S Curthoys; Allan S Jones
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Dynamic visual acuity during passive and self-generated transient head rotation in normal and unilaterally vestibulopathic humans.

Authors:  Jun-ru Tian; Igor Shubayev; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Vertical dynamic visual acuity in normal subjects and patients with vestibular hypofunction.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; Susan J Herdman; Ronald J Tusa
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Role of central preprogramming in dynamic visual acuity with vestibular loss.

Authors:  S J Herdman; M C Schubert; R J Tusa
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-10

8.  The ten-minute examination of the dizzy patient.

Authors:  J A Goebel
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.420

9.  Modified dynamic visual acuity tests after acoustic neuroma resection.

Authors:  Helen S Cohen; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Recovery of dynamic visual acuity in unilateral vestibular hypofunction.

Authors:  Susan J Herdman; Michael C Schubert; Vallabh E Das; Ronald J Tusa
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-08
View more
  12 in total

1.  Effects of distance and duration on vertical dynamic visual acuity in screening healthy adults and people with vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Brian T Peters; Helen S Cohen; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Feasibility of the clinical dynamic visual acuity test in typically developing preschoolers.

Authors:  Evi Verbecque; Niels De Belder; Tessa Marijnissen; Luc Vereeck; Paul Van de Heyning; Ann Hallemans
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Challenging the Vestibular System Affects Gait Speed and Cognitive Workload in Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Linda D'Silva; Prabhakar Chalise; Michael Rippee; Hannes Devos
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  RELATIONSHIPS AMONG COMMON VISION AND VESTIBULAR TESTS IN HEALTHY RECREATIONAL ATHLETES.

Authors:  John D Heick; Curt Bay; Thomas P Dompier; Tamara C Valovich McLeod
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-08

5.  Specific Organ Targeted Vestibular Physiotherapy: The Pivot in the Contemporary Management of Vertigo and Imbalance.

Authors:  Anirban Biswas; Bibhas Barui
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-11-20

6.  The Gait Disorientation Test: A New Method for Screening Adults With Dizziness and Imbalance.

Authors:  Colin R Grove; Bryan C Heiderscheit; G Mark Pyle; Brian J Loyd; Susan L Whitney
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 7.  Interaction between Vestibular Compensation Mechanisms and Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy: 10 Recommendations for Optimal Functional Recovery.

Authors:  Michel Lacour; Laurence Bernard-Demanze
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Vestibular Dysfunction and Difficulty with Driving: Data from the 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys.

Authors:  Eric X Wei; Yuri Agrawal
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Development of a Computerized Device for Evaluating Vestibular Function in Locomotion: A New Evaluation Tool of Vestibular Hypofunction.

Authors:  Po-Yin Chen; Li-Wei Chou; Ying-Chun Jheng; Shih-En Huang; Lieber Po-Hung Li; Chung-Huang Yu; Chung-Lan Kao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Gaze shift dynamic visual acuity: A functional test of gaze stability that distinguishes unilateral vestibular hypofunction.

Authors:  Po-Yin Chen; Ying-Chun Jheng; Shih-En Huang; Lieber Po-Hung Li; Shun-Hwa Wei; Michael C Schubert; Chung-Lan Kao
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.354

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.