BACKGROUND: Dynamic visual acuity (DVA) testing may be a useful, indirect indicator of vestibulo-ocular reflex function. Previous evidence shows that acuity for 2 m targets differs little between patients and normals using a 75 ms display duration and that healthy subjects do not differ in acuity when standing and walking while viewing a far target but they do differ when viewing a near target. OBJECTIVE: Improve the protocol of a screening tool by testing the hypothesis that healthy control subjects and patients and with unilateral peripheral vestibular weakness differ on DVA when viewing far targets while seated. METHODS: Controls and patients were tested while they were seated in a chair that oscillated vertically at 2 Hz. They viewed a computer screen 4 m away, while stationary and while moving, with viewing times of either 75 ms or 500 ms. RESULTS: The amount of change between static and dynamic conditions did not differ significantly between patients and controls for the 75 ms condition but controls had lower difference scores than patients when using the 500 ms duration. The ROC value was low, 0.68. Compared to historical data using the 75 ms duration at a distance of 2 m, subjects in both diagnostic groups had better visual acuity at the 75 ms/4 m distance. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that using the longer duration is better for differentiating patients from healthy controls and they support previous evidence showing that near target viewing is more challenging.
BACKGROUND: Dynamic visual acuity (DVA) testing may be a useful, indirect indicator of vestibulo-ocular reflex function. Previous evidence shows that acuity for 2 m targets differs little between patients and normals using a 75 ms display duration and that healthy subjects do not differ in acuity when standing and walking while viewing a far target but they do differ when viewing a near target. OBJECTIVE: Improve the protocol of a screening tool by testing the hypothesis that healthy control subjects and patients and with unilateral peripheral vestibular weakness differ on DVA when viewing far targets while seated. METHODS: Controls and patients were tested while they were seated in a chair that oscillated vertically at 2 Hz. They viewed a computer screen 4 m away, while stationary and while moving, with viewing times of either 75 ms or 500 ms. RESULTS: The amount of change between static and dynamic conditions did not differ significantly between patients and controls for the 75 ms condition but controls had lower difference scores than patients when using the 500 ms duration. The ROC value was low, 0.68. Compared to historical data using the 75 ms duration at a distance of 2 m, subjects in both diagnostic groups had better visual acuity at the 75 ms/4 m distance. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that using the longer duration is better for differentiating patients from healthy controls and they support previous evidence showing that near target viewing is more challenging.
Authors: Rose Marie Rine; Dale Roberts; Bree A Corbin; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma; Jennifer Beaumont; Jerry Slotkin; Michael C Schubert Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2012
Authors: Domenic Vital; Stefan C A Hegemann; Dominik Straumann; Oliver Bergamin; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Angehrn; Kai-Uwe Schmitt; Rudolf Probst Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2010-07
Authors: Brian T Peters; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Helen S Cohen; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Jacob J Bloomberg Journal: J Vestib Res Date: 2012-01-01 Impact factor: 2.435
Authors: Samuel Bert Boadi-Kusi; Samuel Kyei; Frederick Afum Asare; Andrew Owusu-Ansah; Agnes Awuah; Charles Darko-Takyi Journal: J Optom Date: 2015-09-11