Literature DB >> 15820515

Noticeable, troublesome and objectionable limits of blur.

David A Atchison1, Scott W Fisher, Carol A Pedersen, P Gareth Ridall.   

Abstract

We investigated limits at which induced blur becomes noticeable, troublesome and objectionable. We used 15 cyclopleged subjects, a Badal optometer with lines of three high contrast letters as targets, 3-6 mm artificial pupils, and 0.0-0.7 logMAR letter sizes. For 0.0 logMAR size, mean "noticeable" blur limits were +/-0.33D, +/-0.30D and +/-0.28D at 3 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm, respectively, but increased by about 70% for 0.7 logMAR letters. All limits reduced by about 17% as pupil size increased from 3 mm to 6 mm. Letter size had a significant influence on all blur limits (1.6-2.1 times), but blur direction had no significant effect. Magnitudes of "troublesome" and 'objectionable" limits were 1.6-1.8 times and 2.1-2.5 times relative to "noticeable" limits, respectively. Our results suggest criteria for troublesome and objectionable blur are relatively unaffected by letter size.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15820515     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  A relationship between tolerance of blur and personality.

Authors:  Russell L Woods; C Randall Colvin; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Blur Detection, Depth of Field, and Accommodation in Emmetropic and Hyperopic Children.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Ruth E Manny; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Subjective and objective depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes: comparison between extended depth of focus, trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Rubén Sánchez-Jean; David Carmona-González; David P Piñero; Ainhoa Molina-Martín
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Accommodative Gain in Relation to Perceived Target Clarity.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Heather A Anderson; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Shape and individual variability of the blur adaptation curve.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Influence of simple myopic against-the-rule and with-the-rule astigmatism on visual acuity in eyes with monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Toshiya Yamamoto; Takahiro Hiraoka; Simone Beheregaray; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Minimum change in spherical aberration that can be perceived.

Authors:  Silvestre Manzanera; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS.

Authors:  Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Rubén Sánchez-Jean; David Carmona-Gonzalez; David P Piñero; Ainhoa Molina-Martín
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Image Quality Analysis of Eyes Undergoing LASER Refractive Surgery.

Authors:  Samrat Sarkar; Pravin Krishna Vaddavalli; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.