Literature DB >> 11716060

The influence of task requirements on priming in object decision and matching.

T Liu1, L A Cooper.   

Abstract

We argue that task requirements can be the determinant in generating different results in studies on visual object recognition. We investigated priming for novel visual objects in three implicit memory tasks. A study-test design was employed in which participants first viewed line drawings of unfamiliar objects and later made different decisions about structural aspects of the objects. Priming for both symmetric and asymmetric possible objects was observed in a task requiring a judgment of structural possibility. However, when the task was changed to one requiring a judgment of structural symmetry, only symmetric possible objects showed priming. Finally, in a matching task in which participants made a same-different judgment, only symmetric possible objects exhibited priming. These results suggest that an understanding of object representation will be most fruitful if it is based on careful analyses of both the task demands and their interaction(s) with encoding and retrieval processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11716060     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

1.  Long-term repetition priming with symmetrical polygons and words.

Authors:  Z Kersteen-Tucker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-01

2.  The role of attention and study time in explicit and implicit memory for unfamiliar visual stimuli.

Authors:  D Ganor-Stern; J G Seamon; M Carrasco
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11

3.  Generalization to novel views from view combination.

Authors:  K Srinivas; J Schwoebel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

4.  Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.

Authors:  D L Schacter; L A Cooper; S M Delaney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-03

5.  Exact and conceptual repetition dissociate conceptual memory tests: problems for transfer appropriate processing theory.

Authors:  K B McDermott; H L Roediger
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1996-03

6.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993).

Authors:  M J Tarr; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Bias in the priming of object decisions.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Spatial comprehension and comparison processes in verification tasks.

Authors:  R J Glushko; L A Cooper
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays.

Authors:  H B Barlow; B C Reeves
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine.

Authors:  M J Tarr; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-07
View more
  5 in total

1.  Naming and grasping common objects: a priming study.

Authors:  Camelia Garofeanu; Grzegorz Króliczak; Melvyn A Goodale; G Keith Humphrey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

3.  Priming of familiar and unfamiliar visual objects over delays in young and older adults.

Authors:  Anja Soldan; H John Hilton; Lynn A Cooper; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-03

4.  Bias effects in the possible/impossible object decision test with matching objects.

Authors:  Anja Soldan; H John Hilton; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

5.  Human Object-Similarity Judgments Reflect and Transcend the Primate-IT Object Representation.

Authors:  Marieke Mur; Mirjam Meys; Jerzy Bodurka; Rainer Goebel; Peter A Bandettini; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.