Literature DB >> 11163856

Invariance of long-term visual priming to scale, reflection, translation, and hemisphere.

J Fiser1, I Biederman.   

Abstract

The representation of shape mediating visual object priming was investigated. In two blocks of trials, subjects named images of common objects presented for 185 ms that were bandpass filtered, either at high (10 cpd) or at low (2 cpd) center frequency with a 1.5 octave bandwidth, and positioned either 5 degrees right or left of fixation. The second presentation of an image of a given object type could be filtered at the same or different band, be shown at the same or translated (and mirror reflected) position, and be the same exemplar as that in the first block or a same-name different-shaped exemplar (e.g. a different kind of chair). Second block reaction times (RTs) and error rates were markedly lower than they were on the first block, which, in the context of prior results, was indicative of strong priming. A change of exemplar in the second block resulted in a significant cost in RTs and error rates, indicating that a portion of the priming was visual and not just verbal or basic-level conceptual. However, a change in the spatial frequency (SF) content of the image had no effect on priming despite the dramatic difference it made in appearance of the objects. This invariance to SF changes was also preserved with centrally presented images in a second experiment. Priming was also invariant to a change in left-right position (and mirror orientation) of the image. The invariance over translation of such a large magnitude suggests that the locus of the representation mediating the priming is beyond an area that would be homologous to posterior TEO in the monkey. We conclude that this representation is insensitive to low level image variations (e.g. SF, precise position or orientation of features) that do not alter the basic part-structure of the object. Finally, recognition performance was unaffected by whether low or high bandpassed images were presented either in the left or right visual field, giving no support to the hypothesis of hemispheric differences in processing low and high spatial frequencies.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11163856     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00234-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  Repetition priming from moving faces.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Vicki Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

2.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  The visual system supports online translation invariance for object identification.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Bowers; Ivan I Vankov; Casimir J H Ludwig
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

4.  Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for size invariance in masked picture repetition priming.

Authors:  Marianna D Eddy; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 6.  Memory-prediction errors and their consequences in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Michael S Kraus; Richard S E Keefe; Ranga K R Krishnan
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 7.  Repetition priming in picture naming: sustained learning through the speeding of multiple processes.

Authors:  Wendy S Francis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10

8.  Neocortical Rebound Depolarization Enhances Visual Perception.

Authors:  Kenta Funayama; Genki Minamisawa; Nobuyoshi Matsumoto; Hiroshi Ban; Allen W Chan; Norio Matsuki; Timothy H Murphy; Yuji Ikegaya
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  A cultural side effect: learning to read interferes with identity processing of familiar objects.

Authors:  Régine Kolinsky; Tânia Fernandes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-31

10.  The role of perceptual load in object recognition.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Zhicheng Lin; Nahid Zokaei; Volker Thoma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.