| Literature DB >> 17948070 |
David M Schnyer1, Ian G Dobbins, Lindsay Nicholls, Sarah Davis, Mieke Verfaellie, Daniel L Schacter.
Abstract
Repeated classification of a visually presented stimulus rapidly leads to a form of response learning that bypasses the original evaluation in favor of a more efficient response mechanism. In two experiments, we examined the level of input and output representations that make up this form of learning. In Experiment 1, alterations in the finger mapping of the output response had no effect on the expression of response learning, demonstrating that a classification decision, not motor output, is associated with repeated items. In Experiments 2A and 2B, we tested whether response learning would transfer across different visual exemplars of a studied item. There was no evidence of transfer to different visual exemplars, even when these exemplars were judged to be highly visually similar. Taken together, these results indicate that response learning consists of the formation of an association between a specific visual representation and a classification decision.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17948070 PMCID: PMC2034352 DOI: 10.3758/bf03193617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Cognit ISSN: 0090-502X