Literature DB >> 12468843

Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: One mobile-bearing and one fixed-bearing.

K Y Chiu1, T P Ng, W M Tang, P Lam.   

Abstract

We compared the early results of mobile-bearing knee prosthesis with fixed-bearing knee prosthesis in 16 patients who had one-stage, sequential, bilateral replacements. In each patient, a Low Contact Stress (LCS, Depuy) rotating-platform prosthesis was inserted in one side, and an Anatomic Modular Knee (AMK, Depuy) posterior-stabilised prosthesis was inserted in the other side. The same surgical routines were adopted for both sides in each patient. There were significant improvements in the Knee Society knee score and functional score, as well as the Oxford Knee score after both mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knee replacements (p<0.001). However, we could not find any significant difference between the clinical results of the two prostheses. The authors early experience with the mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis was as favourable as the medium-term experience of the fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis in this prospective, match-pair study.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 12468843     DOI: 10.1177/230949900100900109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  13 in total

1.  Mobile-bearing prosthesis did not improve mid-term clinical results of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Hideki Mizu-uchi; Shingo Fukagawa; Hiromasa Miura; Ken Okazaki; Hideo Matsuda; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees in bilateral total knee replacements.

Authors:  T Watanabe; T Tomita; M Fujii; J Hashimoto; K Sugamoto; H Yoshikawa
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses.

Authors:  D Biau; M M Mullins; T Judet; P Piriou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Gait analysis and electromyography in fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective, comparative study.

Authors:  Carsten O Tibesku; Kiriakos Daniilidis; Adrian Skwara; Tobias Dierkes; Dieter Rosenbaum; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Rotating-platform TKA no different from fixed-bearing TKA regarding survivorship or performance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B L Fransen; D C van Duijvenbode; M J M Hoozemans; B J Burger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  No difference in anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after 7.9 years.

Authors:  Stefan J M Breugem; Bas van Ooij; Daniël Haverkamp; Inger N Sierevelt; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Comparison of pain perception between open and minimally invasive surgery in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Biagio Moretti; Elsa Vitale; Antonio Esposito; Antonio Colella; Maria Cassano; Angela Notarnicola
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-10-05

9.  One year after navigated total knee replacement, no clinically relevant difference found between fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee replacement in a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Frank Lampe; Anusch Sufi-Siavach; Karina E Bohlen; Ekkehard Hille; Sebastian P M Dries
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-05-27

10.  Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis.

Authors:  Stefan J M Breugem; Inger N Sierevelt; Matthias U Schafroth; Leendert Blankevoort; Gerard R Schaap; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.