Literature DB >> 16206008

Gynecological laparoscopy in residency training program: Dutch perspectives.

W Kolkman1, R Wolterbeek, F W Jansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implementation of laparoscopy into residency training is difficult. This study was conducted to assess the current state of implementation of laparoscopic surgery into gynecological residency program, to identify factors influencing laparoscopic skills training, and to find solutions toward better training and implementation.
METHODS: In 2003 a questionnaire was sent to all 68 postgraduate year 5 and year 6 residents in obstetrics and gynecology in The Netherlands. The questionnaire addressed demographics, performance of laparoscopy, self-perceived competence, simulator training, and factors influencing laparoscopic training in residency.
RESULTS: Of the 68 residents, 60 (88%) responded; 46 (37%) were men and 78 (63%) women. Men showed significant higher mean self-perceived competence in some laparoscopic procedures than women. Of the respondents, 20% had no advanced laparoscopic gynecologist present in their teaching hospital. Residents felt that simulator training is important in relation to their performance in the operating room. Of all gynecological teaching hospitals in the Netherlands, 55% did not have the opportunity of simulator training. Of the respondents who had the possibility of simulator training, 33% did not use the simulator voluntarily. Residents who trained on a simulator felt training was significantly more important (p = 0.02) than residents who never practiced on a simulator. Respondents' laparoscopic skills were subjectively evaluated in the operating room (92%) or were evaluated based on the number of laparoscopic procedures performed as primary surgeon (49%). Of the respondents, 47% were satisfied with their current laparoscopic skills and 27% also felt prepared for the more advanced procedures. Not having been primary surgeon in nonacademic teaching hospitals and even more so in academic teaching hospitals (p < 0.05) was a limiting factor in acquiring laparoscopic skills.
CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of basic laparoscopic procedures into residency training has been successful; however, advanced procedures are not. Simulator training is still in its infancy in The Netherlands, is not frequently used voluntarily, and should be mandatory during residency. Acquired laparoscopic skills on a simulator and in the operating room should be objectively assessed, and above all, training of trainers is imperative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16206008     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0291-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

1.  The need for training opportunities in advanced laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  D W Rattner; K N Apelgren; W S Eubanks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Perceived proficiency in endoscopic techniques among senior obstetrics and gynecology residents.

Authors:  J I Einarsson; A Young; L Tsien; H Sangi-Haghpeykar
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2002-05

3.  Minimally invasive surgery training in Canada: a survey of general surgery.

Authors:  P M Chiasson; D E Pace; C M Schlachta; J Mamazza; E C Poulin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Surgical endoscopy training is integral to general surgery residency and should be integrated into residency and fellowships abandoned.

Authors:  Michael S Nussbaum
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2002-12

5.  The case for fellowships in gastrointestinal and laparoendoscopic surgery.

Authors:  John G Hunter
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Minimally invasive surgical practice: a survey of general surgeons in Ontario.

Authors:  Patrick M Chiasson; David E Pace; Christopher M Schlachta; Joseph Mamazza; Eric C Poulin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Impact of work hour restrictions on resident case experience in an obstetrics and gynecology residency program.

Authors:  May Hsieh Blanchard; Saeid B Amini; Thomas M Frank
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Laparoscopic virtual reality training: are 30 repetitions enough?

Authors:  William C Brunner; James R Korndorffer; Rafael Sierra; Nader N Massarweh; J Bruce Dunne; C Lillian Yau; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Integrating advanced laparoscopy into surgical residency training. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The impact of minimal access surgery on gynaecological surgery in a university gynaecological unit over a 10-year period from 1991 to 2000.

Authors:  F H Loh; N Hameed; S C Ng
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.858

View more
  9 in total

1.  Gynaecological laparoscopy courses in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  H M Elbiss; S George; I Sidky; F M Abu-Zidan
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Value of an objective assessment tool in the operating room.

Authors:  Ellen Hiemstra; Wendela Kolkman; Ron Wolterbeek; Baptist Trimbos; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Implementation of the laparoscopic simulator in a gynecological residency curriculum.

Authors:  W Kolkman; M A J Van de Put; W B Van den Hout; J B M Z Trimbos; F W Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Gynaecologists estimate and experience laparoscopic hysterectomy as more difficult compared with abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Theodoor E Nieboer; Marc E A Spaanderman; Marlies Y Bongers; Mark E Vierhout; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2010-05-28

6.  Skills training in minimally invasive surgery in Dutch obstetrics and gynecology residency curriculum.

Authors:  Ellen Hiemstra; Wendela Kolkman; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2008-05-29

7.  Virtual reality training for endoscopic surgery: voluntary or obligatory?

Authors:  K W van Dongen; W A van der Wal; I H M Borel Rinkes; M P Schijven; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Plastic and reconstructive uterus operations by minimally invasive surgery? A review on myomectomy.

Authors:  Anja Hirschelmann; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2012-01-09

9.  Training on an inexpensive tablet-based device is equally effective as on a standard laparoscopic box trainer: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eliana Montanari; Richard Schwameis; Marisa Louridas; Christian Göbl; Lorenz Kuessel; Stephan Polterauer; Heinrich Husslein
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.