Literature DB >> 1579878

School screening for scoliosis: methodologic considerations. Part 1: External measurements.

J E Pruijs1, W Keessen, R van der Meer, J C van Wieringen, M A Hageman.   

Abstract

In order to determine the applicability of school screening techniques for scoliosis, a methodologic survey was carried out within the framework of a school screening project. The accuracy of the measurements of rib hump height, angle of trunk rotation, and of moiré topography was investigated by assessing the intraobserver and interobserver variation. The validity of these techniques was tested by comparing their outcome to the Cobb angle. Intraobserver variation was measured over both short and long time intervals. The interobserver variation was determined among two orthopaedic surgeons and among a group of six doctors. Results are expressed in a Spearman correlation coefficient and a standard deviation. The Spearman correlation ranges from 0.46 (moiré) to 0.75 (rib hump height) in intraobserver variation, and from 0.60 (rib hump height) to 0.70 (angle of trunk rotation) in interobserver variation. The standard deviations illustrate the interobserver range of the measurements, for rib hump height, 3.7 mm, for rotation, 2.3 degrees, and for moiré, 0.7 lines. The validity of the three methods varied from 0.40 to 0.53 as correlated with the angle of Cobb. The conclusion is that these methods can be applied in school screening techniques, but that they do not allow a sharp distinction between normal and pathologic cases. Instead, it is preferable to define the borderline in terms of a danger zone rather than a strict single value. The danger zone for the rib hump height should be 5-10 mm, for the rotation 3-7 degrees, and for the moiré topography 1-3 lines. Recordings in these zones should be repeated within a few months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1579878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  School screening for scoliosis: the value of quantitative measurement.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; W Keessen; R van der Meer; J C van Wieringen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; M A Hageman; W Keessen; R van der Meer; J C van Wieringen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The benefits of school screening for scoliosis in the central part of The Netherlands.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; R van der Meer; M A Hageman; W Keessen; J C van Wieringen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Radiation-free quantitative assessment of scoliosis: a multi center prospective study.

Authors:  Dror Ovadia; Elhanan Bar-On; Bruno Fragnière; Manuel Rigo; Dalia Dickman; Joseph Leitner; Shlomo Wientroub; Jean Dubousset
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  School screening and point prevalence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in 4000 Norwegian children aged 12 years.

Authors:  Raphael D Adobor; Silje Rimeslatten; Harald Steen; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2011-10-24

6.  Parameter variation in stable scoliosis.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; C Stengs; W Keessen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Study of trunk asymmetry in normal children and adolescents.

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas; Elias S Vasiliadis; Georgios Koufopoulos; Dimitrios Segos; Georgios Triantafyllopoulos; Vasilios Mouzakis
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-11-30

8.  The importance of the size of the trunk inclination angle in the early detection of scoliosis in children.

Authors:  Marek Kluszczyński; Anna Pilis; Dariusz Czaprowski
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Scoliosis detection, patient characteristics, referral patterns and treatment in the absence of a screening program in Norway.

Authors:  Raphael Dziwornu Adobor; Rolf Bjarne Riise; Roger Sørensen; Thomas Johan Kibsgård; Harald Steen; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2012-10-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.