Literature DB >> 8528781

School screening for scoliosis: the value of quantitative measurement.

J E Pruijs1, W Keessen, R van der Meer, J C van Wieringen.   

Abstract

Several studies advocate quantification of the bending test or performing surface topography to reduce the referral rate and to increase the specificity of the bending test in screening for scoliosis. Within the framework of a school screening project all children with a positive bending test were reexamined with measurement of rib hump height, angle of trunk rotation and moiré topography. In the period 1983-1986, out of three cohorts of 10,000 children of 10, 12 and 14 years of age, 3,069 were reexamined, of whom 1931 again tested positive (63%). The value of the three techniques in terms of sensitivity and specificity within the reexamined group was evaluated with regard to the Cobb angle on a spinal radiograph, which was made in 671 cases. A reduction in referrals of 37% was found. No significant difference in the ability to detect scoliosis was found between the three techniques mentioned. It is concluded that measurement techniques are valuable in school screening programmes. In particular, if instead of a single cut-off value, a range within which the examination should be repeated is chosen, high sensitivity and high specificity can be combined. Angle of trunk rotation measurement seems to be the easiest method of screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8528781     DOI: 10.1007/bf00303416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

1.  School screening for scoliosis: methodologic considerations. Part 1: External measurements.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; W Keessen; R van der Meer; J C van Wieringen; M A Hageman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  [Presentation of an apparatus for measurement of scoliotic gibbosities].

Authors:  B Vinchon
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1965 Oct-Nov

3.  Criteria for screening: are the effects predictable?

Authors:  J I Williams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Natural history and school screening for scoliosis.

Authors:  J E Lonstein
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; M A Hageman; W Keessen; R van der Meer; J C van Wieringen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Trunk asymmetries in a Belgian school population.

Authors:  M Vercauteren; M Van Beneden; R Verplaetse; P Croene; D Uyttendaele; R Verdonk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Moiré topography for the diagnosis and documentation of scoliosis.

Authors:  S Willner
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1979-06

8.  The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurement, analysis and response to treatment.

Authors:  T Thulbourne; R Gillespie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1976-02

9.  A prospective prevalence study of scoliosis in Southern Sweden.

Authors:  S Willner; A Udén
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1982-04

10.  Influence of age on proprioceptive accuracy in two dimensions.

Authors:  M Hearn; A Crowe; W Keessen
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1989-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  School screening and point prevalence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in 4000 Norwegian children aged 12 years.

Authors:  Raphael D Adobor; Silje Rimeslatten; Harald Steen; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2011-10-24

2.  Correlation between Topographic Parameters Obtained by Back Surface Topography Based on Structured Light and Radiographic Variables in the Assessment of Back Morphology in Young Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Laura Pino-Almero; María Fe Mínguez-Rey; Rosa María Cibrián-Ortiz de Anda; María Rosario Salvador-Palmer; Salvador Sentamans-Segarra
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-04-12

3.  Evaluation of the iPhone with an acrylic sleeve versus the Scoliometer for rib hump measurement in scoliosis.

Authors:  Maree T Izatt; Gary R Bateman; Clayton J Adam
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2012-07-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.