Literature DB >> 16705434

Radiation-free quantitative assessment of scoliosis: a multi center prospective study.

Dror Ovadia1, Elhanan Bar-On, Bruno Fragnière, Manuel Rigo, Dalia Dickman, Joseph Leitner, Shlomo Wientroub, Jean Dubousset.   

Abstract

Accurate quantitative measurements of the spine are essential for deformity diagnosis and assessment of curve progression. There is much concern related to the multiple exposures to ionizing radiation associated with the Cobb method of radiographic measurement, currently the standard procedure for diagnosis and follow-up of the progression of scoliosis. In addition, the Cobb method relies on 2-D analysis of a 3-D deformity. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the clinical value of Ortelius800 that provides a radiation-free method for scoliosis assessment in three planes (coronal, sagittal, apical), with simultaneous automatic calculation of the Cobb angle in both coronal and sagittal views. Analysis of the clinical value of the device for assessing spinal deformities was performed on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, deformity angles ranging from 10 degrees to 48 degrees. Correlation between Cobb angles measured manually on standard erect posteroanterior radiographs and those calculated by Ortelius800 showed an absolute difference between the measurements to be significantly less than +/- 5 degrees for coronal measurements and significantly less than +/- 6 degrees for sagittal measurements indicating good correlation between the two methods. The measurements from four independent sites and six independent examiners were not significantly different. We found the novel clinical tool to be reliable for following mild and moderate idiopathic curves in both coronal and sagittal planes, without exposing the patient to ionizing radiation. Considering the need for further validation of this new method, any change in treatment protocol should still be based on radiographic control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16705434      PMCID: PMC2198878          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0118-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

1.  The etiology and pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R A Dickson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 0.500

2.  School screening for scoliosis: methodologic considerations. Part 1: External measurements.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; W Keessen; R van der Meer; J C van Wieringen; M A Hageman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Adverse reproductive outcomes among women exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation from diagnostic radiography for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M S Goldberg; N E Mayo; A R Levy; S C Scott; B Poîtras
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation.

Authors:  D L Carman; R H Browne; J G Birch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The clinical value of Moiré topography in the management of scoliosis.

Authors:  T Sahlstrand
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; M A Hageman; W Keessen; R van der Meer; J C van Wieringen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Projecting the lifetime risk of cancer from exposure to diagnostic ionizing radiation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  A R Levy; M S Goldberg; J A Hanley; N E Mayo; B Poitras
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Reducing the lifetime risk of cancer from spinal radiographs among people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  A R Levy; M S Goldberg; N E Mayo; J A Hanley; B Poitras
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Diurnal variation of Cobb angle measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M Beauchamp; H Labelle; G Grimard; C Stanciu; B Poitras; J Dansereau
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Scoliosis: how big are you?

Authors:  R A Dickson
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  4 in total

1.  The validity and reliability of "Spinal Mouse" assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves.

Authors:  Ayse Livanelioglu; Fatma Kaya; Vugar Nabiyev; Gokhan Demirkiran; Tüzün Fırat
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Imaging of non-traumatic spinal diseases in children].

Authors:  G Pärtan; R Eyb; G Artacker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  No effect of osteopathic treatment on trunk morphology and spine flexibility in young women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carol Hasler; Caius Schmid; Andreas Enggist; Conny Neuhaus; Thomas Erb
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Optimization of the examination posture in spinal curvature assessment.

Authors:  Jakub Krejci; Jiri Gallo; Petr Stepanik; Jiri Salinger
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2012-04-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.