Literature DB >> 8988379

The benefits of school screening for scoliosis in the central part of The Netherlands.

J E Pruijs1, R van der Meer, M A Hageman, W Keessen, J C van Wieringen.   

Abstract

The Netherlands has well-organized school health services, and children are assessed on a regular basis for scoliosis among other disturbances and pathologies. The purpose of this study was to assess the benefits of an annual screening programme for scoliosis in the Netherlands. Three cohorts of 10,000 children sampled at 10, 12 and 14 years of age, respectively, were followed for 3 years. Children with a positive bending sign were referred to a second screening stage, in which external asymmetry was quantified. Children diagnosed via the programme (group 1) were compared with those children who had been referred for treatment independently of the screening (group 2). The total number of children in these groups combined was then compared with the number that would have been expected on the basis of accepted prevalence figures for idiopathic scoliosis given in current literature. Over 30,000 children were screened. Although the programme established a total of 57 cases of definite scoliosis (0.18%), the 34 cases (0.11%) already known, mainly detected by previous school health checks, were more severe regarding the risk of progression and treatment. The annual screening programme did not detect a single case that needed surgery. These figures provide the basis on which to decide for or against adopting an annual screening programme for scoliosis; the decision is a socio-political one. Based on this study, we expect all scoliotic patients needing treatment should be detected in time if periodic health checks will be maintained biennially. On medical grounds, it is our view, that screening for scoliosis should not be performed in the Netherlands annually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8988379     DOI: 10.1007/bf00301964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  19 in total

1.  School screening for scoliosis: methodologic considerations. Part 1: External measurements.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; W Keessen; R van der Meer; J C van Wieringen; M A Hageman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Scoliosis: A prospective epidemiological study.

Authors:  H L Brooks; S P Azen; E Gerberg; R Brooks; L Chan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Treating scoliosis.

Authors:  W P Bunnell
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-06

4.  Why school screening for scoliosis should be continued.

Authors:  J E Lonstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The British decision and subsequent events.

Authors:  G Burwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  School screening for scoliosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1989-02

Review 7.  The pendulum has swung too far. Bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the 1990s.

Authors:  R B Winter
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Trunk asymmetries in a Belgian school population.

Authors:  M Vercauteren; M Van Beneden; R Verplaetse; P Croene; D Uyttendaele; R Verdonk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Scoliosis prevalence: a call for a statement of terms.

Authors:  W J Kane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Trunk asymmetry and screening for scoliosis: a longitudinal cohort study of pubertal schoolchildren.

Authors:  M Nissinen; M Heliövaara; M Ylikoski; M Poussa
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.299

View more
  4 in total

1.  Body Mass Hides the Curve: Thoracic Scoliometer Readings Vary by Body Mass Index Value.

Authors:  Adam Margalit; Greg McKean; Adam Constantine; Carol B Thompson; Rushyuan Jay Lee; Paul D Sponseller
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Advantages of a two-step procedure for school-based scoliosis screening.

Authors:  A Leone; A Aulisa; C Perisano; T Re; M Galli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Scoliosis detection, patient characteristics, referral patterns and treatment in the absence of a screening program in Norway.

Authors:  Raphael Dziwornu Adobor; Rolf Bjarne Riise; Roger Sørensen; Thomas Johan Kibsgård; Harald Steen; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2012-10-25

4.  The Clinical Effectiveness of School Screening Programme for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Malaysia.

Authors:  A S Deepak; J Y Ong; Dsk Choon; C K Lee; C K Chiu; Cyw Chan; M K Kwan
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2017-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.