Literature DB >> 7552652

Parameter variation in stable scoliosis.

J E Pruijs1, C Stengs, W Keessen.   

Abstract

The reliability of scoliosis parameters such as the Cobb angle, the angle of trunk rotation and moir e topography is known from several publications. These studies concern intra- and interobserver variations; they are in general of transversal nature, which means the measurements were performed on the same subject within a short time period. From clinical experience it appears that these variations may be greater when scoliosis patients are followed over several years. In order to determine the parameter variation in the follow-up of children with scoliosis, a retrospective study was undertaken. From among our outpatient population, 41 children with stable scoliosis over a period of at least 2 years were selected. Stable scoliosis was defined as a spinal deformity which, in retrospect, had not deteriorated during at least a 2-year period prior to the end of growth. Hence no indication for treatment was found for this group. The measurements of the angle of external trunk rotation, moiré topography and Cobb angle of these children during the follow-up period were submitted to statistical computations using one-way analysis of variance. Variations in the results of Cobb angle measurement and the measurement of the angle of trunk rotation were found to be no different to the variations in intra- and interobserver measurements as reported mainly from transversal studies. The variation found in moiré topography, in moiré contour lines and in angle moiré determination, was, however, considered too great for measurements to be reliable. In conclusion, only Cobb angle determination and external measurement of trunk rotation can be accepted as valid follow-up parameters from a methodological viewpoint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7552652     DOI: 10.1007/bf00298242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  19 in total

1.  School screening for scoliosis: methodologic considerations. Part 1: External measurements.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; W Keessen; R van der Meer; J C van Wieringen; M A Hageman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation.

Authors:  D L Carman; R H Browne; J G Birch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error.

Authors:  R T Morrissy; G S Goldsmith; E C Hall; D Kehl; G H Cowie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  [Methods of surface measurements in idiopathic scoliosis].

Authors:  U Heise; R Behrend; J Hinzmann
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb

5.  The clinical value of Moiré topography in the management of scoliosis.

Authors:  T Sahlstrand
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Variability of scoliosis measurement from spinal roentgenograms.

Authors:  C E Beekman; V Hall
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1979-06

7.  Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; M A Hageman; W Keessen; R van der Meer; J C van Wieringen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Surface stereophotogrammetry of thoracic kyphosis.

Authors:  A J Carr; R J Jefferson; A R Turner-Smith; I Weisz; D C Thomas; T Stavrakis; G R Houghton
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1989-04

Review 9.  Brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. An update on concepts and technique.

Authors:  D K Kehl; R T Morrissy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  [Follow-up problems in scoliosis patients].

Authors:  G Schumpe; P Hofmann; H Rössler
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1984 May-Jun
View more
  2 in total

1.  Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?

Authors:  Antonio De Carvalho; Raphaël Vialle; Laurent Thomsen; Julien Amzallag; Guillaume Cluzel; Hubert Ducou le Pointe; Pierre Mary
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Body structures and physical complaints in upper limb reduction deficiency: a 24-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Sietke G Postema; Corry K van der Sluis; Kristina Waldenlöv; Liselotte M Norling Hermansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.