Literature DB >> 15795068

How do pigeons represent numbers? Studies of number scale bisection.

William A Roberts1.   

Abstract

Pigeons' bisection of two number scales, 1-16 and 2-32, was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, pigeons learned to choose different comparison keys following 1 or 16 key pecks and 2 or 32 key pecks and then were tested with intermediate numbers of key pecks on nonreinforced probe trials. Psychophysical curves that plotted choice of the large number key against number of pecks showed superposition of the two number scales and indifference between the two keys at the geometric means of each scale. The same procedures were used in Experiment 2, but pigeons were trained to bisect each scale at its arithmetic mean. Two asymmetries appeared in curves that plotted discrimination performance against number: near the midpoints of the scales, accuracy was higher for high numbers than for low numbers, but this relationship reversed at the ends of the scales, with low numbers discriminated more accurately than high numbers. An associative model that assumed stimulus generalization between numbers was used to predict the findings of these two experiments. The model showed a good qualitative fit to the obtained data when it was assumed that number was represented on a log scale and generalization was constant at all numbers but not when it was assumed that number was represented on a linear scale and generalization was scalar.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15795068     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  11 in total

1.  Discrimination and representation of relative numerosity in a bisection task by pigeons.

Authors:  Lavinia Tan; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Scalar effects in the visual discrimination of numerosity by pigeons.

Authors:  Jacky Emmerton; Jennifer C Renner
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  When in doubt, chimpanzees rely on estimates of past reward amounts.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Emily H Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Monkeys match and tally quantities across senses.

Authors:  Kerry E Jordan; Evan L Maclean; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-06-20

5.  Human nonverbal discrimination of relative and absolute number.

Authors:  Lavinia Tan; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Impact of stimulus format and reward value on quantity discrimination in capuchin and squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  Regina Paxton Gazes; Alison R Billas; Vanessa Schmitt
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  The olfactory capability of dogs to discriminate between different quantities of food.

Authors:  Shayla M Jackson; Glynis K Martin; William A Roberts
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  A physiologically-inspired model of numerical classification based on graded stimulus coding.

Authors:  John Pearson; J D Roitman; E M Brannon; M L Platt; Sridhar Raghavachari
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Visual nesting of stimuli affects rhesus monkeys' (Macaca mulatta) quantity judgments in a bisection task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Quantity representation in children and rhesus monkeys: linear versus logarithmic scales.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Julie S Johnson-Pynn; Christopher Ready
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2007-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.