Literature DB >> 16933803

Scalar effects in the visual discrimination of numerosity by pigeons.

Jacky Emmerton1, Jennifer C Renner.   

Abstract

Pigeons trained in a conditional discrimination procedure to respond to a visual array made a left or right choice, depending on which of two numbers of elements (i.e., anchor numerosities) the array contained. They were then tested with novel arrays at these anchor numerosities, as well as at interpolated and extrapolated numerosities. Various control conditions showed that the birds' discrimination performance was primarily based on stimulus numerosity, and not on other factors, such as brightness or area. Results from a series of tests, spanning a wide range of numerosities, conformed to scalar principles. Psychometric functions showed superposition, indicating that Weber's law applies to numerosity discrimination. The subjective midpoint between anchor values was at the geometric mean. Variability about this bisection point increased in proportion to the numerical value of the mean.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16933803     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  33 in total

1.  Subtracting pigeons: logarithmic or linear?

Authors:  S Dehaene
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

2.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers.

Authors:  S Cordes; R Gelman; C R Gallistel; J Whalen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

3.  Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  E M Brannon; H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-01

4.  Global-feature classification can be acquired more rapidly than local-feature classification in both humans and pigeons.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; A J Wills; Stephen E G Lea
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-10-11       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Subitizing: magical numbers or mere superstition?

Authors:  J D Balakrishnan; F G Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1992

6.  Span and rate of apprehension in children and adults.

Authors:  M T Chi; D Klahr
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1975-06

7.  Chance stimulus sequences for discrimination tasks.

Authors:  B J Fellows
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Effect of item arrangement on perceived numerosity: randomness vs regularity.

Authors:  N Ginsburg
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1976-10

9.  Near point of accommodation in pigeons.

Authors:  K A Macko; W Hodos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Development of elementary numerical abilities: a neuronal model.

Authors:  S Dehaene; J P Changeux
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  15 in total

1.  Discrimination and representation of relative numerosity in a bisection task by pigeons.

Authors:  Lavinia Tan; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  Honeybees foraging for numbers.

Authors:  Martin Giurfa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Monkeys match and tally quantities across senses.

Authors:  Kerry E Jordan; Evan L Maclean; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-06-20

4.  Human nonverbal discrimination of relative and absolute number.

Authors:  Lavinia Tan; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 5.  Numerical assessment in the wild: insights from social carnivores.

Authors:  Sarah Benson-Amram; Geoff Gilfillan; Karen McComb
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Evolution of cognitive and neural solutions enabling numerosity judgements: lessons from primates and corvids.

Authors:  Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A new approach for assessment of mental architecture: repeated tagging.

Authors:  Aire Raidvee; Agne Põlder; Jüri Allik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Quantity representation in children and rhesus monkeys: linear versus logarithmic scales.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Julie S Johnson-Pynn; Christopher Ready
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2007-11-26

9.  Numerosity representations in crows obey the Weber-Fechner law.

Authors:  Helen M Ditz; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Activity counts: the effect of swimming activity on quantity discrimination in fish.

Authors:  Luis M Gómez-Laplaza; Robert Gerlai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.