Literature DB >> 33620699

The olfactory capability of dogs to discriminate between different quantities of food.

Shayla M Jackson1, Glynis K Martin1, William A Roberts2.   

Abstract

A previous study failed to find evidence that dogs could use olfactory cues to discriminate between 1 and 5 hot dog slices presented on a single trial (Horowitz et al., Learning and Motivation, 44, 207-217, 2013). In the experiments reported here, multiple trials were used to test dogs' ability to use olfaction to choose one of two opaque containers under which a larger number of food items was placed. In Experiment 1, dogs chose between 1 and 5 hot dog slices. In Experiments 2 and 3, we examined dogs' ability to discriminate between numbers of hot dog slices that varied in the numerical distance and the ratio between the smaller and larger quantities. Experiment 4 explored olfactory discrimination between quantities of a different food, dog kibble. Experiments 1-3 all showed that dogs used olfactory stimuli to choose the larger number of hot dog slices, but Experiments 2 and 3 revealed no effects of distance or ratio between numerical quantities. In Experiment 4, dogs failed to discriminate between 1 and 5 pieces of dog kibble. Factors that allow dogs to use olfactory cues to discriminate between quantities are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distance effect; Dog; Food type; Olfaction; Quantity discrimination; Ratio effect

Year:  2021        PMID: 33620699     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-021-00463-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  13 in total

1.  Subtracting pigeons: logarithmic or linear?

Authors:  S Dehaene
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

2.  How do pigeons represent numbers? Studies of number scale bisection.

Authors:  William A Roberts
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Elephants have a nose for quantity.

Authors:  Joshua M Plotnik; Daniel L Brubaker; Rachel Dale; Lydia N Tiller; Hannah S Mumby; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Dogs (Canis familiaris) use odor cues to show episodic-like memory for what, where, and when.

Authors:  Ka Ho Lo; William A Roberts
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Odor span task in dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Sarah Krichbaum; Bart Rogers; Emma Cox; L Paul Waggoner; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  M J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  A comparative study of memory for olfactory discriminations: Dogs (Canis familiaris), rats (Rattus norvegicus), and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Gordon Ka-Ho Lo; Krista Macpherson; Hayden MacDonald; William A Roberts
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Olfaction-based Detection Distance: A Quantitative Analysis of How Far Away Dogs Recognize Tortoise Odor and Follow It to Source.

Authors:  Mary E Cablk; John C Sagebiel; Jill S Heaton; Cindee Valentin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  The dog and rat olfactory receptor repertoires.

Authors:  Pascale Quignon; Mathieu Giraud; Maud Rimbault; Patricia Lavigne; Sandrine Tacher; Emmanuelle Morin; Elodie Retout; Anne-Sophie Valin; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Jacques Nicolas; Francis Galibert
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  A Test of Canine Olfactory Capacity: Comparing Various Dog Breeds and Wolves in a Natural Detection Task.

Authors:  Zita Polgár; Mari Kinnunen; Dóra Újváry; Ádám Miklósi; Márta Gácsi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.