Literature DB >> 21048231

Discrimination and representation of relative numerosity in a bisection task by pigeons.

Lavinia Tan1, Randolph C Grace.   

Abstract

We trained 4 pigeons in a numerical bisection task to discriminate between pairs of keylight flashes with a ratio of 1:3 (2 vs. 6, 4 vs. 12, and 8 vs. 24) that were presented in a sample phase. Responses to the blue key were reinforced after a sequence of a larger number of flashes, and responses to the white key were reinforced after a sequence of a smaller number of flashes. The intervals between flashes in the sample phase were randomized to attenuate the covariation of temporal cues with flash number. Pigeons responded accurately in each of the discriminations, with typically 85%-90% correct responses. Transfer tests showed that the proportion of large responses increased with number and performance generalized to larger values outside the training ranges. Psychometric functions superposed when plotted on a relative scale, and estimates of Weber fractions were approximately constant, suggesting that variability was scalar. However, contrary to previous research in nonhumans, bisection points were located at the arithmetic, not geometric, mean. Hierarchical logistic regressions confirmed significant control over responding by number beyond that attributable to temporal cues. These results show that pigeons are able to respond accurately in a relative numerosity discrimination with successively presented visual stimuli, although the nature of the numerical representation and response rule remains unclear.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21048231     DOI: 10.3758/LB.38.4.408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  27 in total

1.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers.

Authors:  S Cordes; R Gelman; C R Gallistel; J Whalen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  The location and interpretation of the bisection point.

Authors:  Lorraine G Allan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2002-01

3.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans.

Authors:  J H Wearden; A Ferrara
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1996-02

5.  Numerical reproduction in pigeons.

Authors:  Lavinia Tan; Randolph C Grace; Shasta Holland; Anthony P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2007-10

6.  Weber's Law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Kerry E Jordan; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  M J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 8.  The representation of numerical magnitude.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  A test of the Pfanzagl bisection model in rats.

Authors:  T G Raslear
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1983-01

10.  Stimulus spacing effects in temporal bisection by humans.

Authors:  J H Wearden; A Ferrara
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1995-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Human nonverbal discrimination of relative and absolute number.

Authors:  Lavinia Tan; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.