Eyal Margalit1, Wallace B Thoreson. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198-5540, USA. emargalit@unmc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Retinal prosthetic devices are being developed to bypass degenerated retinal photoreceptors by directly activating retinal neurons with electrical stimulation. However, little is known about retinal activity during such stimulation. METHODS: Whole cell patch-clamp recordings were obtained from ganglion and bipolar cells in the salamander retinal slice preparation. A stimulating electrode was positioned at the vitreal surface of the slice. RESULTS: Brief pulses of cathodic current evoked transient inward currents in ganglion cells arising from action potentials. Longer pulses (>5 milliseconds) also evoked sustained inward currents in ganglion cells that appeared synaptic in origin because, unlike transient currents, sustained currents were blocked by inhibiting synaptic transmission with Cd2+. These synaptic currents reversed around ECl and were blocked by picrotoxin, strychnine, or both, suggesting they were mediated by GABAa/c and glycine receptors. Synaptic currents were also blocked by the NMDA antagonist MK801 and the KA/AMPA antagonist NBQX, suggesting that epiretinal stimulation evoked glutamate release from bipolar cells, which in turn stimulated the release of GABA and glycine from amacrine cells. Sustained currents were also evoked by epiretinal stimulation in bipolar cells. These currents reversed near ECl and were blocked by picrotoxin, suggesting they arose from GABAa/c receptors. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse duration is an important parameter for effective activation of the inner retina by epiretinal stimulation. Brief pulses evoke action potentials only in ganglion cells. However, longer pulses also evoke sustained synaptic currents by stimulating glutamate release from bipolar cell terminals, which, in turn, evokes the release of GABA and glycine from amacrine cells.
PURPOSE: Retinal prosthetic devices are being developed to bypass degenerated retinal photoreceptors by directly activating retinal neurons with electrical stimulation. However, little is known about retinal activity during such stimulation. METHODS: Whole cell patch-clamp recordings were obtained from ganglion and bipolar cells in the salamander retinal slice preparation. A stimulating electrode was positioned at the vitreal surface of the slice. RESULTS: Brief pulses of cathodic current evoked transient inward currents in ganglion cells arising from action potentials. Longer pulses (>5 milliseconds) also evoked sustained inward currents in ganglion cells that appeared synaptic in origin because, unlike transient currents, sustained currents were blocked by inhibiting synaptic transmission with Cd2+. These synaptic currents reversed around ECl and were blocked by picrotoxin, strychnine, or both, suggesting they were mediated by GABAa/c and glycine receptors. Synaptic currents were also blocked by the NMDA antagonist MK801 and the KA/AMPA antagonist NBQX, suggesting that epiretinal stimulation evoked glutamate release from bipolar cells, which in turn stimulated the release of GABA and glycine from amacrine cells. Sustained currents were also evoked by epiretinal stimulation in bipolar cells. These currents reversed near ECl and were blocked by picrotoxin, suggesting they arose from GABAa/c receptors. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse duration is an important parameter for effective activation of the inner retina by epiretinal stimulation. Brief pulses evoke action potentials only in ganglion cells. However, longer pulses also evoke sustained synaptic currents by stimulating glutamate release from bipolar cell terminals, which, in turn, evokes the release of GABA and glycine from amacrine cells.
Authors: Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland; Gildo Y Fujii; Robert Greenberg; Richard Williamson; Jim Little; Brian Mech; Valerie Cimmarusti; Gretchen Van Boemel; Gislin Dagnelie; Eugene de Juan Journal: Vision Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 1.886
Authors: Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2011-04-19 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Ashish K Ahuja; Matthew R Behrend; Masako Kuroda; Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Morven A Cameron; Amr Al Abed; Yossi Buskila; Socrates Dokos; Nigel H Lovell; John W Morley Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 6.167