Literature DB >> 27991456

A new approach to integrate GPU-based Monte Carlo simulation into inverse treatment plan optimization for proton therapy.

Yongbao Li1, Zhen Tian, Ting Song, Zhaoxia Wu, Yaqiang Liu, Steve Jiang, Xun Jia.   

Abstract

Monte Carlo (MC)-based spot dose calculation is highly desired for inverse treatment planning in proton therapy because of its accuracy. Recent studies on biological optimization have also indicated the use of MC methods to compute relevant quantities of interest, e.g. linear energy transfer. Although GPU-based MC engines have been developed to address inverse optimization problems, their efficiency still needs to be improved. Also, the use of a large number of GPUs in MC calculation is not favorable for clinical applications. The previously proposed adaptive particle sampling (APS) method can improve the efficiency of MC-based inverse optimization by using the computationally expensive MC simulation more effectively. This method is more efficient than the conventional approach that performs spot dose calculation and optimization in two sequential steps. In this paper, we propose a computational library to perform MC-based spot dose calculation on GPU with the APS scheme. The implemented APS method performs a non-uniform sampling of the particles from pencil beam spots during the optimization process, favoring those from the high intensity spots. The library also conducts two computationally intensive matrix-vector operations frequently used when solving an optimization problem. This library design allows a streamlined integration of the MC-based spot dose calculation into an existing proton therapy inverse planning process. We tested the developed library in a typical inverse optimization system with four patient cases. The library achieved the targeted functions by supporting inverse planning in various proton therapy schemes, e.g. single field uniform dose, 3D intensity modulated proton therapy, and distal edge tracking. The efficiency was 41.6  ±  15.3% higher than the use of a GPU-based MC package in a conventional calculation scheme. The total computation time ranged between 2 and 50 min on a single GPU card depending on the problem size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27991456      PMCID: PMC5206994          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/62/1/289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  21 in total

1.  Influence of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy with different dose delivery techniques.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Yupeng Li; Xiaoqiang Li; Wenhua Cao; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Optimization of radiobiological effects in intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Jan J Wilkens; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  GPU-based ultrafast IMRT plan optimization.

Authors:  Chunhua Men; Xuejun Gu; Dongju Choi; Amitava Majumdar; Ziyi Zheng; Klaus Mueller; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A GPU-accelerated and Monte Carlo-based intensity modulated proton therapy optimization system.

Authors:  Jiasen Ma; Chris Beltran; Hok Seum Wan Chan Tseung; Michael G Herman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Perl; J Shin; J Schumann; B Faddegon; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A Monte Carlo-based treatment planning tool for proton therapy.

Authors:  A Mairani; T T Böhlen; A Schiavi; T Tessonnier; S Molinelli; S Brons; G Battistoni; K Parodi; V Patera
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A Monte Carlo study for the calculation of the average linear energy transfer (LET) distributions for a clinical proton beam line and a radiobiological carbon ion beam line.

Authors:  F Romano; G A P Cirrone; G Cuttone; F Di Rosa; S E Mazzaglia; I Petrovic; A Ristic Fira; A Varisano
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential.

Authors:  Drosoula Giantsoudi; Clemens Grassberger; David Craft; Andrzej Niemierko; Alexei Trofimov; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Monte Carlo fast dose calculator for proton radiotherapy: application to a voxelized geometry representing a patient with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pablo Yepes; Sharmalee Randeniya; Phillip J Taddei; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Full Monte Carlo-Based Biologic Treatment Plan Optimization System for Intensity Modulated Carbon Ion Therapy on Graphics Processing Unit.

Authors:  Nan Qin; Chenyang Shen; Min-Yu Tsai; Marco Pinto; Zhen Tian; Georgios Dedes; Arnold Pompos; Steve B Jiang; Katia Parodi; Xun Jia
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Internal Motion Estimation by Internal-external Motion Modeling for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Haibin Chen; Zichun Zhong; Yiwei Yang; Jiawei Chen; Linghong Zhou; Xin Zhen; Xuejun Gu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.