Literature DB >> 15789256

Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival rates.

B P Jacob1, B Salky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy for the management of colon cancer remains a controversial therapeutic option, especially when the outcomes are compared with the historically accepted survival data and recurrence rates after open surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates after laparoscopic colon resection for invasive colon adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: A total of 129 patients underwent consecutive laparoscopic colectomies for colon adenocarcinoma (between April 1992 and 2004 January) by a single surgeon at a single institution. Records were analyzed retrospectively and follow-up data was obtained. The Student t-test, Cox regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival data were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: After patients with noninvasive disease on final pathology were excluded, the study population comprised 88 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomies for invasive colon cancer with > 2 years of follow-up. Of these cases, 81 (93%) were amenable for complete follow-up at 11years (41 women and 40 men; mean age, 76 years). Mean follow-up was 61 months. There was one perioperative death (1.2%), and the overall postoperative morbidity rate was 13.6%. The average number of lymph nodes harvested was 10.1 (+/-6). There were no port site recurrences. The Kaplan-Meier survival data were as follows for 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival, respectively stage I (n = 34) 89% and 89%; stage II (n = 22), 65% and 59%; stage III (n = 19), 72% and 67%; stages I-III combined, (n = 75), 77% and 73%.
CONCLUSIONS: For this specific cohort of patients undergoing curative laparoscopic colectomies for invasive colon adenocarcinoma, the mean follow-up was > 5 years. Overall survival and disease-free survival for stage I, II, and III colon cancer as well as for stages I-III combined are favorable and comparable to historically acceptable open colectomy survival rates. Overall survival and disease-free survival after laparoscopic colectomy for invasive colon cancer is no worse, and perhaps better than, the previously reported rates for the same procedure done by an open technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15789256     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8921-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Luca Gianotti; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Radaelli; Paola Gruarin; Paolo Dellabona; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. Lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J W Lumley; G A Fielding; M Rhodes; L K Nathanson; S Siu; R W Stitz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Laparoscopic assisted colectomy.

Authors:  L Gellman; B Salky; M Edye
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic colonic procedures.

Authors:  M E Franklin; R Ramos; D Rosenthal; W Schuessler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period.

Authors:  Sanjiv K Patankar; Sergio W Larach; Andrea Ferrara; Paul R Williamson; Joseph T Gallagher; Samuel DeJesus; Shekar Narayanan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: trial update.

Authors:  L Stocchi; H Nelson
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group.

Authors:  J W Fleshman; H Nelson; W R Peters; H C Kim; S Larach; R R Boorse; W Ambroze; P Leggett; R Bleday; S Stryker; B Christenson; S Wexner; A Senagore; D Rattner; J Sutton; A P Fine
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection. Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry.

Authors:  P Vukasin; A E Ortega; F L Greene; G D Steele; A J Simons; G J Anthone; L A Weston; R W Beart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar tissue after large-bowel cancer surgery.

Authors:  E S Hughes; F T McDermott; A L Polglase; W R Johnson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy.

Authors:  S D Wexner; S M Cohen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  32 in total

1.  Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: technical aspects and short-term results.

Authors:  Fabio Cianchi; Etleva Qirici; Giacomo Trallori; Beatrice Mallardi; Benedetta Badii; Giuliano Perigli
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2012-03

2.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer and adequate lymphadenectomy: association between survival and number of lymph nodes.

Authors:  F Polignano; N Henderson; S-M Alishahi; A Zito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  [Pathophysiology of capnoperitoneum. Implications for ventilation and hemodynamics].

Authors:  A Vogt; B Eberle
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: An Update (with Special Reference to Indian Scenario).

Authors:  G S Moirangthem
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-04-15

5.  Selection for laparoscopic resection confers a survival benefit in colorectal cancer surgery in England.

Authors:  Alan Askari; Subramanian Nachiappan; Andrew Currie; Alex Bottle; Thanos Athanasiou; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic surgery in the elderly: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrew T Bates; Celia Divino
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.745

7.  Does a laparoscopic approach affect the number of lymph nodes harvested during curative surgery for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Galal El-Gazzaz; Tracy Hull; Jeffery Hammel; Daniel Geisler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Many patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer receive surveillance colonoscopies earlier than recommended by guidelines.

Authors:  Amanpal Singh; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for TNM stage III colon cancer: results of a prospective multicenter study in Italy.

Authors:  Mario Guerrieri; Roberto Campagnacci; Angelo De Sanctis; Giovanni Lezoche; Paolo Massucco; Massimo Summa; Rosaria Gesuita; Lorenzo Capussotti; Giuseppe Spinoglio; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 10.  Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: the new frontier?

Authors:  Basil J Ammori; Saleh Baghdadi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.