Literature DB >> 8620781

Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. Lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients.

J W Lumley1, G A Fielding, M Rhodes, L K Nathanson, S Siu, R W Stitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To audit the development and outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the Royal Brisbane Hospital.
METHODS: Since July 1991, laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for benign and malignant colorectal disease has been performed on more than 300 patients at the Royal Brisbane Hospital. This paper summarizes the outcome for the first 240 patients who underwent a laparoscopic colorectal procedure. All laparoscopic data were collected prospectively, and for selected studies, data were compared with open surgical controls.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients required open conversion (7.9 percent). There was a significant decrease in wound infection rates in patients having a laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (3.6 percent) compared with historical controls (7.9 percent) (P < 0.05; chi-squared). There were five anastomotic leaks, five laparotomies for postoperative adhesive obstruction, and four perioperative deaths. A total of 103 patients had a procedure for colorectal cancer. Of the 79 potentially curative procedures, there have been 5 (6.3 percent) recurrences to date.
CONCLUSION: The overall morbidity and mortality in this series seem to be acceptable compared with that of open procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8620781     DOI: 10.1007/bf02068069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  14 in total

1.  Optimal port site placement.

Authors:  R W Stitz
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection in octogenarians.

Authors:  P A Seshadri; J Mamazza; C M Schlachta; M O Cadeddu; E C Poulin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages?

Authors:  P A Seshadri; E C Poulin; C M Schlachta; M O Cadeddu; J Mamazza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J E Hartley; B J Mehigan; A W MacDonald; P W Lee; J R Monson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Elective laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease: results of a multicenter study in 179 patients.

Authors:  J L Bouillot; J C Berthou; G Champault; C Meyer; J P Arnaud; G Samama; D Collet; P Bressler; A Gainant; B Delaitre
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival rates.

Authors:  B P Jacob; B Salky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Laparoscopy for Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Brenton R Franklin; Michael P McNally
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-04

Review 8.  Minimally invasive surgery for diverticulitis.

Authors:  R S Turley; C R Mantyh; J Migaly
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  The pathogenesis of port-site recurrences.

Authors:  M A Reymond; C Schneider; S Kastl; W Hohenberger; F Köckerling
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  R Veldkamp; M Gholghesaei; H J Bonjer; D W Meijer; M Buunen; J Jeekel; B Anderberg; M A Cuesta; A Cuschierl; A Fingerhut; J W Fleshman; P J Guillou; E Haglind; J Himpens; C A Jacobi; J J Jakimowicz; F Koeckerling; A M Lacy; E Lezoche; J R Monson; M Morino; E Neugebauer; S D Wexner; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.