Literature DB >> 23139539

3D finite element analysis to detect stress distribution: spiral family implants.

Matteo Danza1, Ilaria Zollino, Luigi Paracchini, Guidi Riccardo, Stefano Fanali, Francesco Carinci.   

Abstract

AIM: Spiral family implants are a root-form fixtures with increasing thickness of tread. This characteristic gives a self-tapping and self-condensing bone properties to implants. To study spiral family implant inserted in different bone quality and connected with abutments of different angulations a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was performed. Once drawn the systems that were object of the study by CAD (Computer Aided Design), the FEA discretized solids composing the system in many infinitesimal little elementary solids defined finite elements. This lead to a mesh formation where the single finite elements were connected among them by nodes. For the 3 units bone-implant-abutments several thousand of tetrahedral elements having 10 parabolic nodes were employed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The biomechanical behaviour of 4.2 mm × 13 mm dental implants, connecting screw, straight and 15° and 25° angulated abutment subjected to static loads, in contact with high and poor bone quality was evaluated by FEA. A double system was analyzed: a) FY strength acting along Y axis and having 200 N intensity; b) FY and FZ couple of strengths applied along Y and Z directions and having respectively 200N and 140N intensity. The materials were considered as homogeneous, linear and isotropic. Then the FEA simulation was performed hypothesizing a linearity between loads and deformations.
RESULTS: The lowest stress value was found in the system composed by implants and straight abutments loaded with a vertical strength, while the highest stress value were found in implants and 15° angulated abutment loaded with a angulated strength. In addition, the lower is the bone quality (i.e. D4) the higher is the distribution of the stress within the bone.
CONCLUSION: Spiral family implants can be used successfully in low bone quality but a straight force is recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Distribution; Finite element analysis; Implant; Spiral; Stress

Year:  2010        PMID: 23139539      PMCID: PMC3454091          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-009-0081-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  24 in total

Review 1.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J P Geng; K B Tan; G R Liu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant.

Authors:  Haldun Iplikçioğlu; Kivanç Akça; Murat C Cehreli; Salme Sahin
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.

Authors:  Mauro Cruz; Thomaz Wassall; Elson Magalhães Toledo; Luis Paulo da Silva Barra; Afonso Celso de Castro Lemonge
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis.

Authors:  H-J Chun; S-Y Cheong; J-H Han; S-J Heo; J-P Chung; I-C Rhyu; Y-C Choi; H-K Baik; Y Ku; M-H Kim
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.837

5.  Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive boen loading.

Authors:  C E Misch
Journal:  Int J Oral Implantol       Date:  1990

6.  Finite element analysis of fixed prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants.

Authors:  K R Williams; C J Watson; W M Murphy; J Scott; M Gregory; D Sinobad
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.677

7.  Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.

Authors:  Arturo N Natali; Piero G Pavan; Andrea L Ruggero
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 8.  Implant prosthodontic treatment options for the edentulous patient.

Authors:  G A Zarb; A Schmitt
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.837

9.  Finite element analysis of an osseointegrated stepped screw dental implant.

Authors:  J P Geng; D W Xu; K B C Tan; G R Liu
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Finite element stress and strain analysis of the bone surrounding a dental implant: effect of variations in bone modulus.

Authors:  S E Clift; J Fisher; C J Watson
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.617

View more
  2 in total

1.  Biomechanical behaviour of a jawbone loaded with a prosthetic system supported by monophasic and biphasic implants.

Authors:  F Inchingolo; L Paracchini; F DE Angelis; A Cielo; A Orefici; D Spitaleri; L Santacroce; E Gheno; A Palermo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-02-14

Review 2.  Application of Finite Element Model in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  M Sesha Reddy; Rajasekar Sundram; Hossam Abdelatty Eid Abdemagyd
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2019-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.