Literature DB >> 15773858

Substrate and cofactor requirements for RNA editing of chloroplast transcripts in Arabidopsis in vitro.

Carla E Hegeman1, Michael L Hayes, Maureen R Hanson.   

Abstract

None of the macromolecular components of the chloroplast RNA editing apparatus has yet been identified. In order to facilitate biochemical purification and characterization of the chloroplast RNA editing apparatus, we have identified conditions suitable for production of chloroplast extracts from the model plant Arabidopsis that are capable of editing exogenous substrates produced by in vitro transcription. A simple poisoned primer extension assay readily quantified editing extent of mutated and wild-type substrates. Maximum editing efficiency typically varied from 10 to 40% with different chloroplast preparations. Substrates carrying as little as 47 nt surrounding the psbE editing site were as efficiently edited as longer substrates. Editing activity was stimulated when either ATP, CTP, or dCTP was provided to the extract, an unusual observation also recently seen with plant mitochondrial editing extracts. Editing was sensitive to a zinc chelator, also a characteristic of the mammalian APOBEC editing enzyme, which is a zinc-dependent cytidine deaminase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15773858     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02360.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  24 in total

1.  Reverse genetic screening identifies five E-class PPR proteins involved in RNA editing in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Mizuki Takenaka; Daniil Verbitskiy; Anja Zehrmann; Axel Brennicke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  When you can't trust the DNA: RNA editing changes transcript sequences.

Authors:  Volker Knoop
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Identification of a sequence motif critical for editing of a tobacco chloroplast transcript.

Authors:  Michael L Hayes; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  Transcriptional response of Escherichia coli to TPEN.

Authors:  Tara K Sigdel; J Allen Easton; Michael W Crowder
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Cross-competition in editing of chloroplast RNA transcripts in vitro implicates sharing of trans-factors between different C targets.

Authors:  Wade P Heller; Michael L Hayes; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  High conservation of a 5' element required for RNA editing of a C target in chloroplast psbE transcripts.

Authors:  Michael L Hayes; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Multiple specificity recognition motifs enhance plant mitochondrial RNA editing in vitro.

Authors:  Daniil Verbitskiy; Johannes A van der Merwe; Anja Zehrmann; Axel Brennicke; Mizuki Takenaka
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A conserved glutamate residue in the C-terminal deaminase domain of pentatricopeptide repeat proteins is required for RNA editing activity.

Authors:  Michael L Hayes; Kim N Dang; Michael F Diaz; R Michael Mulligan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  The plastid genome as a chassis for synthetic biology-enabled metabolic engineering: players in gene expression.

Authors:  Heidi S Schindel; Agnieszka A Piatek; C Neal Stewart; Scott C Lenaghan
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.570

10.  A study of new Arabidopsis chloroplast RNA editing mutants reveals general features of editing factors and their target sites.

Authors:  Kamel Hammani; Kenji Okuda; Sandra K Tanz; Anne-Laure Chateigner-Boutin; Toshiharu Shikanai; Ian Small
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 11.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.