Literature DB >> 18192271

Cross-competition in editing of chloroplast RNA transcripts in vitro implicates sharing of trans-factors between different C targets.

Wade P Heller1, Michael L Hayes, Maureen R Hanson.   

Abstract

C-->U plant organellar RNA editing is required for the translation of evolutionarily conserved and functional proteins. 28 different C targets of RNA editing have been identified in maize chloroplasts, and hundreds of Cs are edited in mitochondria. Mutant analysis in Arabidopsis has indicated that absence of a single site-specific recognition protein can result in loss of editing of a single C target, raising the possibility that each C target requires a recognition protein. Here we show that transcripts encompassing two editing sites, ZMrpoB C467 and ZMrps14 C80, can compete editing activity from each other in vitro despite limited sequence similarity. The signal causing competition overlaps a 5'-cis element required for editing efficiency. A single five-nucleotide mutation spanning the region from -20 to -16 relative to the edited C of rpoB C467 is sufficient to eliminate its substrate editing as well as its ability to compete editing activity from rps14 C80 substrates. A corresponding mutation in an rps14 C80 competitor likewise eliminated its ability to compete editing activity from rpoB C467 substrates. Taken together, our results indicate that the RNA sequences mediating both editing efficiency and cross-competition are highly similar and that a common protein is involved in their editing. Sharing of trans-factors can facilitate editing of the large number of different C targets in plant organelles so that a different protein factor would not be required for every editing site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18192271      PMCID: PMC2276328          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M709595200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  29 in total

1.  Editing of plastid RNA in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes.

Authors:  Michael Tillich; Helena T Funk; Christian Schmitz-Linneweber; Peter Poltnigg; Bartolomé Sabater; Mercedes Martin; Rainer M Maier
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  A systematic search for RNA editing sites in pea chloroplasts: an editing event causes diversification from the evolutionarily conserved amino acid sequence.

Authors:  Misato Inada; Tadamasa Sasaki; Maki Yukawa; Takahiko Tsudzuki; Masahiro Sugiura
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.927

3.  A pentatricopeptide repeat protein is essential for RNA editing in chloroplasts.

Authors:  Emi Kotera; Masao Tasaka; Toshiharu Shikanai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Substrate and cofactor requirements for RNA editing of chloroplast transcripts in Arabidopsis in vitro.

Authors:  Carla E Hegeman; Michael L Hayes; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  Mutations of cytochrome b6 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii disclose the functional significance for a proline to leucine conversion by petB editing in maize and tobacco.

Authors:  F Zito; R Kuras; Y Choquet; H Kössel; F A Wollman
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 6.  RNA editing in plant organelles: machinery, physiological function and evolution.

Authors:  T Shikanai
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  RNA editing in tobacco chloroplasts leads to the formation of a translatable psbL mRNA by a C to U substitution within the initiation codon.

Authors:  J Kudla; G L Igloi; M Metzlaff; R Hagemann; H Kössel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Site-specific factor involved in the editing of the psbL mRNA in tobacco plastids.

Authors:  S Chaudhuri; H Carrer; P Maliga
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  A nuclear mutation in maize blocks the processing and translation of several chloroplast mRNAs and provides evidence for the differential translation of alternative mRNA forms.

Authors:  A Barkan; M Walker; M Nolasco; D Johnson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Sequence elements critical for efficient RNA editing of a tobacco chloroplast transcript in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Michael L Hayes; Martha L Reed; Carla E Hegeman; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  When you can't trust the DNA: RNA editing changes transcript sequences.

Authors:  Volker Knoop
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Multiple specificity recognition motifs enhance plant mitochondrial RNA editing in vitro.

Authors:  Daniil Verbitskiy; Johannes A van der Merwe; Anja Zehrmann; Axel Brennicke; Mizuki Takenaka
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Expression of plastid genes: organelle-specific elaborations on a prokaryotic scaffold.

Authors:  Alice Barkan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  MEF9, an E-subclass pentatricopeptide repeat protein, is required for an RNA editing event in the nad7 transcript in mitochondria of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Mizuki Takenaka
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Distinct roles for sequences upstream of and downstream from Physarum editing sites.

Authors:  Amy C Rhee; Benjamin H Somerlot; Neeta Parimi; Jonatha M Gott
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  A comparative genomics approach identifies a PPR-DYW protein that is essential for C-to-U editing of the Arabidopsis chloroplast accD transcript.

Authors:  John C Robbins; Wade P Heller; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  A DYW domain-containing pentatricopeptide repeat protein is required for RNA editing at multiple sites in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Anja Zehrmann; Daniil Verbitskiy; Johannes A van der Merwe; Axel Brennicke; Mizuki Takenaka
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Post-transcriptional control of chloroplast gene expression.

Authors:  Eva M del Campo
Journal:  Gene Regul Syst Bio       Date:  2009-03-12

9.  CURE-Chloroplast: a chloroplast C-to-U RNA editing predictor for seed plants.

Authors:  Pufeng Du; Liyan Jia; Yanda Li
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Loss of matK RNA editing in seed plant chloroplasts.

Authors:  Michael Tillich; Vinh Le Sy; Katrin Schulerowitz; Arndt von Haeseler; Uwe G Maier; Christian Schmitz-Linneweber
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.