Literature DB >> 16938973

Efficient array beam forming by spatial filtering for ultrasound B-mode imaging.

Kang-Sik Kim1, Jie Liu, Michael F Insana.   

Abstract

This paper proposes an efficient array beam-forming method using spatial matched filtering (SMF) for ultrasonic imaging. In the proposed method, ultrasonic waves are transmitted from an array subaperture with fixed transmit focus as in conventional array imaging. At receive, radio frequency echo signals from each receive channel are passed through a spatial matched filter that is constructed based on the system transmit-receive spatial impulse response. The filtered echo signals are then summed without time delays. The filter concentrates and spatially registers the echo energy from each element so that the pulse-echo impulse response of the summed output is focused with acceptably low side lobes. Analytical beam pattern analysis and simulation results using a linear array show that this spatial filtering method can improve lateral resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio as compared with conventional dynamic receive focusing (DRF) methods. Experimental results with a linear array are consistent but point out the need to address additional practical issues. Spatial filtering is equivalent to synthetic aperture methods that dynamically focus on both transmit and receive throughout the field of view. In one common example of phase aberrations, the SMF method was degraded to a degree comparable to conventional DRF methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938973      PMCID: PMC2722924          DOI: 10.1121/1.2214393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Filter-based synthetic transmit and receive focusing.

Authors:  M L Li; P C Li
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.578

2.  Optimal focusing by spatio-temporal inverse filter. I. Basic principles.

Authors:  M Tanter; J F Aubry; J Gerber; J L Thomas; M Fink
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Multielement synthetic transmit aperture imaging using temporal encoding.

Authors:  Kim Løkke Gammelmark; Jorgen Arendt Jensen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Linear system models for ultrasonic imaging: application to signal statistics.

Authors:  Roger J Zemp; Craig K Abbey; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Synthetic aperture imaging using sources with finite aperture: deconvolution of the spatial impulse response.

Authors:  Fredrik Lingvall; Tomas Olofsson; Tadeusz Stepinski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Navigator echo motion artifact suppression in synthetic aperture ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Yasser M Kadah; Abd El-Monem El-Sharkawy; Abou-Bakr M Youssef
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Detection performance theory for ultrasound imaging systems.

Authors:  Roger J Zemp; Mark D Parry; Craig K Abbey; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Adaptive imaging and spatial compounding in the presence of aberration.

Authors:  Jeremy J Dahl; Drake A Guenther; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Synthetic receive aperture imaging with phase correction for motion and for tissue inhomogeneities. I. Basic principles.

Authors:  L F Nock; G E Trahey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers.

Authors:  J A Jensen; N B Svendsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Imaging with unfocused regions of focused ultrasound beams.

Authors:  Roger Zemp; Michael F Insana
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  SNR comparisons of beamforming strategies.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Kang-Sik Kim; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Beamforming using spatial matched filtering with annular arrays (L).

Authors:  Kang-Sik Kim; Jie Liu; Michael F Insana
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A method for accurate in silico modeling of ultrasound transducer arrays.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Beamforming of sound from two-dimensional arrays using spatial matched filters.

Authors:  Jesse T Yen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Ultrasonic Reverberation Clutter Suppression Using Multiphase Apodization With Cross Correlation.

Authors:  Junseob Shin; Yu Chen; Harshawn Malhi; Jesse T Yen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  A 5-MHz cylindrical dual-layer transducer array for 3-D transrectal ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Yuling Chen; Man Nguyen; Jesse T Yen
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  Generalized cystic resolution: a metric for assessing the fundamental limits on beamformer performance.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Robust finite impulse response beamforming applied to medical ultrasound.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.725

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.