Literature DB >> 16897067

A presentation of attentional semantics.

Giorgio Marchetti1.   

Abstract

The paper presents the two main assumptions of Attentional Semantics--(A) and (B), and its main aim (C). (A) Conscious experience is determined by attention: there cannot be consciousness without attention. Consciousness is explained as the product of attentional activity. Attentional activity can be performed thanks to a special kind of energy: nervous energy. This energy is supplied by the organ of attention. When we perform attentional activity, we use our nervous energy. This activity directly affects the organ of attention, causing a variation in the state of the nervous energy. This variation constitutes the phenomenal aspect of consciousness. (B) Words are tools to pilot attention. The meanings of words isolate, de-contextualize, "freeze" and classify in an articulated system the ever-changing and multiform stream of our conscious experiences. Each meaning is composed of the sequence of invariable elements that, independently of any individual occurrence of a given conscious experience, are responsible for the production of any instance of that conscious experience. The elements composing the meanings of words are attentional operations: each word conveys the condensed instructions on the attentional operations one has to perform if one wants to consciously experience what is expressed through and by it. (C) Attentional Semantics aims at finding the attentional instruction conveyed by the meanings of words. To achieve this goal, it tries: (1) to identify the sequence of the elementary conscious experiences that invariably accompany, and are prompted by, the use of the word being analyzed; (2) to describe these conscious experiences in terms of the attentional operations that are responsible for their production; and (3) to identify the unconscious and non-conscious operations that, directly or indirectly, serve either as the support that makes it possible for the attentional operations to take place, be completed, and occur in a certain way, or as the necessary complement that makes it possible to execute and implement the activities determined and triggered by the conscious experiences. The origins of Attentional Semantics are also presented, and the methodological problems researchers encounter when analyzing meanings in attentional terms are discussed. Finally, a brief comparison with the other kinds of semantics is made.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897067     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-006-0144-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  11 in total

Review 1.  A framework for consciousness.

Authors:  Francis Crick; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck.

Authors:  C Fagot; H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Attention and the subjective expansion of time.

Authors:  Peter Ulric Tse; James Intriligator; Josée Rivest; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-10

5.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

Review 6.  The attention system of the human brain.

Authors:  M I Posner; S E Petersen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; J D St James
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

8.  Attention gating in short-term visual memory.

Authors:  A Reeves; G Sperling
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Visual processing capacity and attentional control.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; G T Gardner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-04

10.  Does probe RT measure central processing demand?

Authors:  P McLeod
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Studies on time: a proposal on how to get out of circularity.

Authors:  Giorgio Marchetti
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-05-27

2.  Toward cognitivist ontologies : on the role of selective attention for upper ontologies.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Carstensen
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-04-27

3.  Mind operational semantics and brain operational architectonics: a putative correspondence.

Authors:  Giulio Benedetti; Giorgio Marchetti; Alexander A Fingelkurts; Andrew A Fingelkurts
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2010-07-08

Review 4.  Operational Noology as a new methodology for the study of thought and language: theoretical aspects and possible practical applications.

Authors:  Giulio Benedetti
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2006-08-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.