Literature DB >> 35755089

Adjusting statistical benchmark risk analysis to account for non-spatial autocorrelation, with application to natural hazard risk assessment.

Jingyu Liu1, Walter W Piegorsch1,2,3, A Grant Schissler4, Rachel R McCaster5,6, Susan L Cutter5,6.   

Abstract

We develop and study a quantitative, interdisciplinary strategy for conducting statistical risk analyses within the 'benchmark risk' paradigm of contemporary risk assessment when potential autocorrelation exists among sample units. We use the methodology to explore information on vulnerability to natural hazards across 3108 counties in the conterminous 48 US states, applying a place-based resilience index to an existing knowledgebase of hazardous incidents and related human casualties. An extension of a centered autologistic regression model is applied to relate local, county-level vulnerability to hazardous outcomes. Adjustments for autocorrelation embedded in the resiliency information are applied via a novel, non-spatial neighborhood structure. Statistical risk-benchmarking techniques are then incorporated into the modeling framework, wherein levels of high and low vulnerability to hazards are identified.
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benchmark dose; centered autologistic model; maximum pseudo-likelihood; natural hazard vulnerability; non-spatial autocorrelation; quantitative risk assessment

Year:  2021        PMID: 35755089      PMCID: PMC9225316          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1904385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.416


  8 in total

1.  Benchmark dose calculation from epidemiological data.

Authors:  E Budtz-Jørgensen; N Keiding; P Grandjean
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations.

Authors:  Carl Folke; Steve Carpenter; Thomas Elmqvist; Lance Gunderson; C S Holling; Brian Walker
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Multiplicity-adjusted inferences in risk assessment: benchmark analysis with quantal response data.

Authors:  Daniela K Nitcheva; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West; Ralph L Kodell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  The concept of resilience revisited.

Authors:  Siambabala Bernard Manyena
Journal:  Disasters       Date:  2006-12

5.  Autologistic models for benchmark risk or vulnerability assessment of urban terrorism outcomes.

Authors:  Jingyu Liu; Walter W Piegorsch; A Grant Schissler; Susan L Cutter
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.483

6.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes.

Authors:  K S Crump
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1984-10

7.  Redefining community based on place attachment in a connected world.

Authors:  Georgina G Gurney; Jessica Blythe; Helen Adams; W Neil Adger; Matthew Curnock; Lucy Faulkner; Thomas James; Nadine A Marshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Information-theoretic model-averaged benchmark dose analysis in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Lingling An; Alissa A Wickens; R Webster West; Edsel A Peña; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.900

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.