Literature DB >> 10473905

Did auditory sensitivity and vocalization evolve independently in otophysan fishes?

F Ladich1.   

Abstract

Otophysine fishes have a series of bones, the Weberian ossicles, which acoustically couple the swimbladder to the inner ear. These fishes have evolved a diversity of sound-generating organs and acoustic signals, although some species, such as the goldfish, are not known to be vocal. Utilizing a recently developed auditory brainstem response (ABR)-recording technique, the auditory sensitivities of representatives of seven families from all four otophysine orders were investigated and compared to the spectral content of their vocalizations. All species examined detect tone bursts from 100 Hz to 5 kHz, but ABR-audiograms revealed major differences in auditory sensitivities, especially at higher frequencies (>1 kHz) where thresholds differed by up to 50 dB. These differences showed no apparent correspondence to the ability to produce sounds (vocal versus non-vocal species) or to the spectral content of species-specific sounds. All fishes have maximum sensitivity between 400 Hz and 1,500 Hz, whereas the major portion of the energy of acoustic signals was in the frequency range of 100-400 Hz (swimbladder drumming sounds) and of 1-3 kHz (stridulatory sounds). Species producing stridulatory sounds exhibited better high-frequency hearing sensitivity (pimelodids, doradids), except for callichthyids, which had poorest hearing ability in this range. Furthermore, fishes emitting both low- and high-frequency sounds, such as pimelodid and doradid catfishes, did not possess two corresponding auditory sensitivity maxima. Based on these results it is concluded that selective pressures involved in the evolution of the Weberian apparatus and the design of vocal signals in otophysines were others (primarily predator or prey detection in quiet freshwater habitats) than those serving to optimize acoustical communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10473905     DOI: 10.1159/000006600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  13 in total

1.  A novel hearing specialization in the New Zealand bigeye, Pempheris adspersa.

Authors:  C A Radford; J C Montgomery; P Caiger; P Johnston; J Lu; D M Higgs
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  The effects of stimulus parameters on auditory evoked potentials of Carassius auratus.

Authors:  Jessica R Garabon; Dennis M Higgs
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Hearing in fishes under noise conditions.

Authors:  Lidia Eva Wysocki; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-03

4.  Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: the relationship between ambient noise, hearing thresholds and sound spectrum.

Authors:  M Lugli; H Y Yan; M L Fine
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Acoustic communication and the evolution of hearing in fishes.

Authors:  F Ladich
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Ontogenetic development of auditory sensitivity and sound production in the squeaker catfish Synodontis schoutedeni.

Authors:  Walter Lechner; Lidia Eva Wysocki; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Sound production to electric discharge: sonic muscle evolution in progress in Synodontis spp. catfishes (Mochokidae).

Authors:  Kelly S Boyle; Orphal Colleye; Eric Parmentier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Does the hearing sensitivity in thorny catfishes depend on swim bladder morphology?

Authors:  Angelika Zebedin; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hearing in cichlid fishes under noise conditions.

Authors:  Friedrich Ladich; Tanja Schulz-Mirbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How do albino fish hear?

Authors:  W Lechner; F Ladich
Journal:  J Zool (1987)       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.322

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.