Literature DB >> 31823003

The effect of biological and anthropogenic sound on the auditory sensitivity of oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau.

Loranzie S Rogers1, Rosalyn L Putland2, Allen F Mensinger2.   

Abstract

Many aquatic organisms use vocalizations for reproductive behavior; therefore, disruption of their soundscape could adversely affect their life history. Male oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) establish nests in shallow waters during spring and attract female fish with boatwhistle vocalizations. Males exhibit high nest fidelity, making them susceptible to anthropogenic sound in coastal waters, which could mask their vocalizations and/or reduce auditory sensitivity levels. Additionally, the effect of self-generated boatwhistles on toadfish auditory sensitivity has yet to be addressed. To investigate the effect of sound exposure on toadfish auditory sensitivity, sound pressure and particle acceleration sensitivity curves were determined using auditory evoked potentials before and after (0-, 1-, 3-, 6- and 9-day) exposure to 1- or 12-h of continuous playbacks to ship engine sound or conspecific vocalization. Exposure to boatwhistles had no effect on auditory sensitivity. However, exposure to anthropogenic sound caused significant decreases in auditory sensitivity for at least 3 days, with shifts up to 8 dB SPL and 20 dB SPL immediately following 1- and 12-h anthropogenic exposure, respectively. Understanding the effect of self-generated and anthropogenic sound exposure on auditory sensitivity provides an insight into how soundscapes affect acoustic communication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AEP; Anthropogenic; Particle acceleration level; Sound pressure level; TTS

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31823003     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-019-01381-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  59 in total

1.  Seasonal and Daily Patterns of the Mating Calls of the Oyster Toadfish, Opsanus tau.

Authors:  Jacey C Van Wert; Allen F Mensinger
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 1.818

2.  Noise-induced threshold shift in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  J Saunders; R Dooling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Quantifying loss of acoustic communication space for right whales in and around a U.S. National Marine Sanctuary.

Authors:  Leila T Hatch; Christopher W Clark; Sofie M Van Parijs; Adam S Frankel; Dimitri W Ponirakis
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Impacts of broadband sound on silver (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and bighead (H. nobilis) carp hearing thresholds determined using auditory evoked potential audiometry.

Authors:  Andrew C Nissen; Brooke J Vetter; Loranzie S Rogers; Allen F Mensinger
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.794

5.  Computerized tomography of the otic capsule and otoliths in the oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau.

Authors:  Peggy L Edds-Walton; Julie Arruda; Richard R Fay; Darlene R Ketten
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 1.804

6.  Age- and size-related changes in the inner ear and hearing ability of the adult zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Dennis M Higgs; Marcy J Souza; Heather R Wilkins; Joelle C Presson; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-06

7.  Anthropogenic noise compromises antipredator behaviour in European eels.

Authors:  Stephen D Simpson; Julia Purser; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Effects of vessel traffic and underwater noise on the movement, behaviour and vocalisations of bottlenose dolphins in an urbanised estuary.

Authors:  Sarah A Marley; Chandra P Salgado Kent; Christine Erbe; Iain M Parnum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Anthropogenic noise pollution from pile-driving disrupts the structure and dynamics of fish shoals.

Authors:  James E Herbert-Read; Louise Kremer; Rick Bruintjes; Andrew N Radford; Christos C Ioannou
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Hearing in cichlid fishes under noise conditions.

Authors:  Friedrich Ladich; Tanja Schulz-Mirbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.