Literature DB >> 15694145

Evaluation of quality of reformatted images from two cone-beam computed tomographic systems.

Dirk Schulze1, Max Heiland, Felix Blake, Uwe Rother, Rainer Schmelzle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare image quality of two different systems based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). STUDY
DESIGN: Primary and secondary reconstructions were performed from data sets of the Siremobil Iso-C(3D) (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) and the NewTom 9000 (NIM s.r.l., Verona, Italy) using a dried human skull. Using defined anatomical structures, image quality was analysed by 10 examiners using a ranking scale.
RESULTS: Regarding image quality there was no statistically significant difference between the two systems compared.
CONCLUSION: The preliminary results show, that imaging of the facial skeleton using the Siremobil Iso-C(3D) can be performed with a quality comparable to the NewTom 9000.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15694145     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2004.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of demineralized bone and bone transplants in vitro and in vivo with cone beam computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  F G Draenert; F Gebhart; M Berthold; M Gosau; W Wagner
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Generation of three-dimensional prototype models based on cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  J Th Lambrecht; D C Berndt; R Schumacher; M Zehnder
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  3D dento-maxillary osteolytic lesion and active contour segmentation pilot study in CBCT: semi-automatic vs manual methods.

Authors:  K Vallaeys; A Kacem; H Legoux; M Le Tenier; C Hamitouche; R Arbab-Chirani
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Impact of prone, supine and oblique patient positioning on CBCT image quality, contrast-to-noise ratio and figure of merit value in the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Juha Koivisto; Maureen van Eijnatten; Jorma Järnstedt; Kirsi Holli-Helenius; Prasun Dastidar; Jan Wolff
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Evaluation of intensity of artefacts in CBCT by radio-opacity of composite simulation models of implants in vitro.

Authors:  N Kuusisto; P K Vallittu; L V J Lassila; S Huumonen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Multi Slice Computed Tomography Image Quality of Human Dried Mandible using 10 Anatomical Landmarks.

Authors:  Samira Saati; Fatemeh Kaveh; Shiva Yarmohammadi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

7.  Beam Hardening Artifacts: Comparison between Two Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanners.

Authors:  Farzad Esmaeili; Masume Johari; Pezhman Haddadi; Mehdi Vatankhah
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2012-06-06

8.  Beam hardening artifacts by dental implants: Comparison of cone-beam and 64-slice computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Farzad Esmaeili; Masume Johari; Pezhman Haddadi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-05

9.  Peri-implant assessment via cone beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Nicolau Silveira-Neto; Mateus Ericson Flores; João Paulo De Carli; Max Dória Costa; Felipe de Souza Matos; Luiz Renato Paranhos; Maria Salete Sandini Linden
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Mandibular cortical indices and their relation to gender and age in the cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Samir Goyushov; Erhan Dursun; Tolga Fikret Tözüm
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.