Literature DB >> 15691961

Use of ethidium monoazide and PCR in combination for quantification of viable and dead cells in complex samples.

Knut Rudi1, Birgitte Moen, Signe Marie Drømtorp, Askild L Holck.   

Abstract

The distinction between viable and dead cells is a major issue in many aspects of biological research. The current technologies for determining viable versus dead cells cannot readily be used for quantitative differentiation of specific cells in mixed populations. This is a serious limitation. We have solved this problem by developing a new concept with the viable/dead stain ethidium monoazide (EMA) in combination with real-time PCR (EMA-PCR). A dynamic range of approximately 4 log(10) was obtained for the EMA-PCR viable/dead assay. Viable/dead differentiation is obtained by covalent binding of EMA to DNA in dead cells by photoactivation. EMA penetrates only dead cells with compromised membrane/cell wall systems. DNA covalently bound to EMA cannot be PCR amplified. Thus, only DNA from viable cells can be detected. We evaluated EMA-PCR with the major food-borne bacterium Campylobacter jejuni as an example. Traditional diagnosis of this bacterium is very difficult due to its specific growth requirements and because it may enter a state where it is viable but not cultivable. The conditions analyzed included detection in mixed and natural samples, survival in food, and survival after disinfection or antibiotic treatment. We obtained reliable viable/dead quantifications for all conditions tested. Comparison with standard fluorescence-based viable/dead techniques showed that the EMA-PCR has a broader dynamic range and enables quantification in mixed and complex samples. In conclusion, EMA-PCR offers a novel real-time PCR method for quantitative distinction between viable and dead cells with potentially very wide application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15691961      PMCID: PMC546808          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.2.1018-1024.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  29 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial viability and culturability.

Authors:  M R Barer; C R Harwood
Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.517

2.  Survival and recovery of viable but noncultivable forms of Campylobacter in aqueous microcosm.

Authors:  R Talibart; M Denis; A Castillo; J M Cappelier; G Ermel
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2000-04-10       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  Fluorescent method for monitoring cheese starter permeabilization and lysis.

Authors:  C J Bunthof; S van Schalkwijk; W Meijer; T Abee; J Hugenholtz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Poultry as a source of Campylobacter and related organisms.

Authors:  J E Corry; H I Atabay
Journal:  Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001

5.  Improved methods for the enumeration of heterotrophic bacteria in bottled mineral waters.

Authors:  R Ramalho; J Cunha; P Teixeira; P A Gibbs
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  Quantitative investigation of the effects of chemical decontamination procedures on the microbiological status of broiler carcasses during processing.

Authors:  P Whyte; J D Collins; K McGill; C Monahan; H O'Mahony
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.077

Review 7.  Molecular methods for the assessment of bacterial viability.

Authors:  J T Keer; L Birch
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.363

8.  Occurrence of and a possible mechanism for resistance to a quaternary ammonium compound in Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  B Aase; G Sundheim; S Langsrud; L M Rørvik
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 5.277

9.  Ethidium monoazide for DNA-based differentiation of viable and dead bacteria by 5'-nuclease PCR.

Authors:  Hege Karin Nogva; Signe Marie Drømtorp; Hilde Nissen; Knut Rudi
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.993

10.  Survival and resuscitation of ten strains of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli under acid conditions.

Authors:  P Chaveerach; A A H M ter Huurne; L J A Lipman; F van Knapen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  75 in total

1.  Effect of a synbiotic yogurt on levels of fecal bifidobacteria, clostridia, and enterobacteria.

Authors:  Amrita Palaria; Ivy Johnson-Kanda; Daniel J O'Sullivan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Seasonal diversity of planktonic protists in Southwestern Alberta rivers over a 1-year period as revealed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and 18S rRNA gene library analyses.

Authors:  Matthew C Thomas; L Brent Selinger; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Establishment and Validation of RNA-Based Predictive Models for Understanding Survival of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Oysters Stored at Low Temperatures.

Authors:  Chao Liao; Yong Zhao; Luxin Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Survival of Vibrio cholerae O1 on fomites.

Authors:  Israt Farhana; Zenat Zebin Hossain; Suhella Mohan Tulsiani; Peter Kjær Mackie Jensen; Anowara Begum
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Toward standardization of diagnostic PCR testing of fecal samples: lessons from the detection of salmonellae in pigs.

Authors:  B Malorny; J Hoorfar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Method for assessment of viability and morphological changes of bacteria in the early stage of colony formation on a simulated natural environment.

Authors:  Yumi Shimomura; Ryuzo Ohno; Fusako Kawai; Kazuhide Kimbara
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Culture conditions of Roseobacter strain 27-4 affect its attachment and biofilm formation as quantified by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Jesper Bartholin Bruhn; Janus Anders Juul Haagensen; Dorthe Bagge-Ravn; Lone Gram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Selective removal of DNA from dead cells of mixed bacterial communities by use of ethidium monoazide.

Authors:  Andreas Nocker; Anne K Camper
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Removal of free extracellular DNA from environmental samples by ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide.

Authors:  Andreas O Wagner; Cornelia Malin; Brigitte A Knapp; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Innovative Use of Palladium Compounds To Selectively Detect Live Enterobacteriaceae in Milk by PCR.

Authors:  Takashi Soejima; Kei-Ji Iwatsuki
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.