Literature DB >> 15687429

Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences.

Julie A Mennella1, M Yanina Pepino, Danielle R Reed.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Flavor is the primary dimension by which young children determine food acceptance. However, children are not merely miniature adults because sensory systems mature postnatally and their responses to certain tastes differ markedly from adults. Among these differences are heightened preferences for sweet-tasting and greater rejection of bitter-tasting foods. The present study tests the hypothesis that genetic variations in the newly discovered TAS2R38 taste gene as well as cultural differences are associated with differences in sensitivity to the bitter taste of propylthiouracil (PROP) and preferences for sucrose and sweet-tasting foods and beverages in children and adults.
DESIGN: Genomic DNA was extracted from cheek cells of a racially and ethnically diverse sample of 143 children and their mothers. Alleles of the gene TAS2R38 were genotyped. Participants were grouped by the first variant site, denoted A49P, because the allele predicts a change from the amino acid alanine (A) to proline (P) at position 49. Henceforth, individuals who were homozygous for the bitter-insensitive allele are referred to as AA, those who were heterozygous for the bitter-insensitive allele are referred to as AP, and those who were homozygous for the bitter-sensitive allele are referred to as PP. Using identical procedures for children and mothers, PROP sensitivity and sucrose preferences were assessed by using forced-choice procedures that were embedded in the context of games that minimized the impact of language development and were sensitive to the cognitive limitations of pediatric populations. Participants were also asked about their preferences in cereals and beverages, and mothers completed a standardized questionnaire that measured various dimensions of their children's temperament.
RESULTS: Genetic variation of the A49P allele influenced bitter perception in children and adults. However, the phenotype-genotype relationship was modified by age such that 64% of heterozygous children, but only 43% of the heterozygous mothers, were sensitive to the lowest concentration (56 micromoles/liter) of PROP. Genotypes at the TAS2R38 locus were significantly related to preferences for sucrose and for sweet-tasting beverages and foods such as cereals in children. AP and PP children preferred significantly higher concentrations of sucrose solutions than did AA children. They were also significantly less likely to include milk or water as 1 of their 2 favorite beverages (18.6% vs 40%) and were more likely to include carbonated beverages as 1 of their most preferred beverages (46.4% vs 28.9%). PP children liked cereals and beverages with a significantly higher sugar content. There were also significant main effects of race/ethnicity on preferences and food habits. As a group, black children liked cereals with a significantly higher sugar content than did white children, and they were also significantly more likely to report that they added sugar to their cereals. Unlike children, there was no correspondence between TAS2R38 genotypes and sweet preference in adults. Here, the effects of race/ethnicity were the strongest determinants, thus suggesting that cultural forces and experience may override this genotype effect on sweet preferences. Differences in taste experiences also affected mother-child interaction, especially when the 2 resided in different sensory worlds. That is, children who had 1 or 2 bitter-sensitive alleles, but whose mothers had none, were perceived by their mothers as being more emotional than children who had no bitter-sensitive alleles.
CONCLUSION: Variations in a taste receptor gene accounted for a major portion of individual differences in PROP bitterness perception in both children and adults, as well as a portion of individual differences in preferences for sweet flavors in children but not in adults. These findings underscore the advantages of studying genotype effects on behavioral outcomes in children, especially as they relate to taste preferences because cultural forces may sometimes override the A49P genotypic effects in adults. New knowledge about the molecular basis of food likes and dislikes in children, a generation that will struggle with obesity and diabetes, may suggest strategies to overcome diet-induced diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15687429      PMCID: PMC1397914          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  35 in total

1.  Localization of a gene for bitter-taste perception to human chromosome 5p15.

Authors:  D R Reed; E Nanthakumar; M North; C Bell; L M Bartoshuk; R A Price
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Factors contributing to individual differences in sucrose preference.

Authors:  M Yanina Pepino; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Genetic analysis of a complex trait in the Utah Genetic Reference Project: a major locus for PTC taste ability on chromosome 7q and a secondary locus on chromosome 16p.

Authors:  Dennis Drayna; Hilary Coon; Un-Kyung Kim; Tami Elsner; Kevin Cromer; Brith Otterud; Lisa Baird; Andy P Peiffer; Mark Leppert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Variations in human taste bud density and taste intensity perception.

Authors:  I J Miller; F E Reedy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1990-06

5.  Bitter taste of saccharin related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil.

Authors:  L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste.

Authors:  V B Duffy; L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2000-06

Review 7.  Fat and sugar: an economic analysis.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Heredity and experience: their relative importance in the development of taste preference in man.

Authors:  L S Greene; J A Desor; O Maller
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1975-05

9.  Natural selection and molecular evolution in PTC, a bitter-taste receptor gene.

Authors:  Stephen Wooding; Un-Kyung Kim; Michael J Bamshad; Jennifer Larsen; Lynn B Jorde; Dennis Drayna
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Ingestive responses of human newborns to salty, sour, and bitter stimuli.

Authors:  J A Desor; O Maller; K Andrews
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1975-10
View more
  152 in total

Review 1.  Bitter and sweet taste receptors in the respiratory epithelium in health and disease.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Taste genes associated with dental caries.

Authors:  S Wendell; X Wang; M Brown; M E Cooper; R S DeSensi; R J Weyant; R Crout; D W McNeil; M L Marazita
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 3.  Genetics of eating behavior: established and emerging concepts.

Authors:  Eleanor R Grimm; Nanette I Steinle
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Shared genetic contributions of fruit and vegetable consumption with BMI in families 20 y after sharing a household.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Seung-Yeon Lee; Sarah C Couch; John Morrison; Jessica G Woo
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Human bitter perception correlates with bitter receptor messenger RNA expression in taste cells.

Authors:  Sarah V Lipchock; Julie A Mennella; Andrew I Spielman; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 6.  Genetics of taste and smell: poisons and pleasures.

Authors:  Danielle Renee Reed; Antti Knaapila
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 7.  CD36 may determine our desire for dietary fats.

Authors:  Nada A Abumrad
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Taking the bitter with the sweet: relationship of supertasting and sweet preference with metabolic syndrome and dietary intake.

Authors:  Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; Deborah F Tate; Dominic Moore; Barry Popkin
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Sex differences in the effects of inherited bitter thiourea sensitivity on body weight in 4-6-year-old children.

Authors:  Kathleen L Keller; Adrienne Reid; Megan C MacDougall; Hope Cassano; Joo Lee Song; Liyong Deng; Patricia Lanzano; Wendy K Chung; Harry R Kissileff
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 10.  The development of sweet taste: From biology to hedonics.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Nuala K Bobowski; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.