Literature DB >> 26416185

Assessment of the Readability of Genetic Counseling Patient Letters.

Emily Brown1, Megan Skinner2, Stephanie Ashley3, Kate Reed4, Shannan DeLany Dixon2.   

Abstract

Patient letters are a powerful tool that genetic counselors use to communicate with their patients. Patient letters are often sent to provide information on a new diagnosis, reiterate test results, and to serve as a permanent record of the visit. Patient letters, however, are only helpful if the patients can understand them. More than 50 % of the US population reads below a 9th grade reading level and over one-third of the population has low health literacy skills. In this study we evaluate the readability of genetic counseling patient letters by assessing reading level, image use, and terminology use. One hundred forty-nine genetic counselors participated in the survey and of these, 79 submitted a sample patient letter. Analyses of the letters revealed a mean reading level of 10.93. On average, 6 genetic terms were included in each letter, and only 25 % of these terms were defined. Analyses of survey responses revealed over 75 % of the genetic counselors did not include images in their patient letters. These results indicate there is room for improvement in order to make genetic counseling patient letters more accessible to the general population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic counseling; Genomic literacy; Patient letters; Readability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26416185     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9890-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  16 in total

1.  Influence of vocabulary and sentence complexity and passive voice on the readability of consumer-oriented mental health information on the Internet.

Authors:  Raymond L Ownby
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

2.  Deficits in retention for verbally presented medical information.

Authors:  Elisabeth H Sandberg; Ritu Sharma; Warren S Sandberg
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead.

Authors:  Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker; Sigall K Bell; Jonathan D Darer; Joann G Elmore; Nadine Farag; Henry J Feldman; Roanne Mejilla; Long Ngo; James D Ralston; Stephen E Ross; Neha Trivedi; Elisabeth Vodicka; Suzanne G Leveille
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Family Communication and Genetic Counseling: The Case of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  J Green; M Richards; F Murton; H Statham; N Hallowell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions.

Authors:  C Delp; J Jones
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  The rapid estimate of adult literacy in genetics (REAL-G): a means to assess literacy deficits in the context of genetics.

Authors:  Lori H Erby; Debra Roter; Susan Larson; Juhee Cho
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Satisfaction, compliance and communication.

Authors:  P Ley
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1982-11

8.  Copying letters to patients with cystic fibrosis (CF): letter content and patient perceptions of benefit.

Authors:  Katherine Treacy; J Stuart Elborn; Jackie Rendall; Judy M Bradley
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health.

Authors:  C Molster; T Charles; A Samanek; P O'Leary
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  What does it mean to be genomically literate?: National Human Genome Research Institute Meeting Report.

Authors:  Belen Hurle; Toby Citrin; Jean F Jenkins; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Neil Lamb; Jo Ellen Roseman; Vence L Bonham
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  6 in total

1.  From the laboratory to the clinic: sharing BRCA VUS reclassification tools with practicing genetics professionals.

Authors:  Bianca M Augusto; Paige Lake; Courtney L Scherr; Fergus J Couch; Noralane M Lindor; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-11-09

2.  Do research participants share genomic screening results with family members?

Authors:  Julia Wynn; Hila Milo Rasouly; Tania Vasquez-Loarte; Akilan M Saami; Robyn Weiss; Sonja I Ziniel; Paul S Appelbaum; Ellen Wright Clayton; Kurt D Christensen; David Fasel; Robert C Green; Heather S Hain; Margaret Harr; Christin Hoell; Iftikhar J Kullo; Kathleen A Leppig; Melanie F Myers; Joel E Pacyna; Emma F Perez; Cynthia A Prows; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Gemme Campbell-Salome; Richard R Sharp; Maureen E Smith; Georgia L Wiesner; Janet L Williams; Carrie L Blout Zawatsky; Ali G Gharavi; Wendy K Chung; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.717

3.  Limitations and Pitfalls of Using Family Letters to Communicate Genetic Risk: a Qualitative Study with Patients and Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Sandi Dheensa; Anneke Lucassen; Angela Fenwick
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Development of Written Materials for Participants in an Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Screening Trial.

Authors:  Katharine J Head; Jane A Hartsock; Tamilyn Bakas; Malaz A Boustani; Matthew Schroeder; Nicole R Fowler
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-04-12

5.  Understanding the Return of Genomic Sequencing Results Process: Content Review of Participant Summary Letters in the eMERGE Research Network.

Authors:  John A Lynch; Richard R Sharp; Sharon A Aufox; Sarah T Bland; Carrie Blout; Deborah J Bowen; Adam H Buchanan; Colin Halverson; Margaret Harr; Scott J Hebbring; Nora Henrikson; Christin Hoell; Ingrid A Holm; Gail Jarvik; Iftikhar J Kullo; David C Kochan; Eric B Larson; Amanda Lazzeri; Kathleen A Leppig; Jill Madden; Maddalena Marasa; Melanie F Myers; Josh Peterson; Cynthia A Prows; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; James Ralston; Hila Milo Rasouly; Aaron Scrol; Maureen E Smith; Amy Sturm; Kelsey Stuttgen; Georgia Wiesner; Marc S Williams; Julia Wynn; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-05-13

6.  "You Always Have It in the Back of Your Mind"-Feelings, Coping, and Support Needs of Women with Pathogenic Variants in Moderate-Risk Genes for Hereditary Breast Cancer Attending Genetic Counseling in Germany: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Claudia Stracke; Clarissa Lemmen; Kerstin Rhiem; Rita Schmutzler; Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.