Literature DB >> 2045867

Cancer risk notification: psychosocial and ethical implications.

C Lerman1, B K Rimer, P F Engstrom.   

Abstract

Basic and medical science investigations have identified a growing number of risk factors important in carcinogenesis. By communicating cancer risk information in medical practice, we have the potential to motivate high-risk individuals to adhere to cancer prevention and surveillance protocols. However, cancer screening and risk notification might have adverse psychologic and social consequences as well. In this review, we address the psychosocial and ethical implications of cancer risk notification. The literature on the psychosocial impact of cancer screening programs and programs for notifying workers exposed to occupational carcinogens is reviewed critically. In addition, we examine new concerns and responsibilities raised by the emerging field of cancer genetics. Suggestions for future research and for patient education are addressed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2045867     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.7.1275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  25 in total

1.  Psychological and screening profiles of first-degree relatives of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  S M Miller; M A Diefenbach; L K Kruus; D Watkins-Bruner; G E Hanks; P F Engstrom
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2001-06

2.  High frequency of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in 42 Belgian families with a small number of symptomatic subjects.

Authors:  G Goelen; E Teugels; M Bonduelle; B Neyns; J De Grève
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  C Lerman; E Ross; A Boyce; P M Gorchov; R McLaughlin; B Rimer; P Engstrom
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Risk estimation, anxiety, and breast cancer worry in women at risk for breast cancer: A single-arm trial of personalized risk communication.

Authors:  Zhuoer Xie; Neil Wenger; Annette L Stanton; Karen Sepucha; Celia Kaplan; Lisa Madlensky; David Elashoff; Jacqueline Trent; Antonia Petruse; Liliana Johansen; Tracy Layton; Arash Naeim
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Healthcare use after screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Margaret M Byrne; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Wei Zhao; Joel L Weissfeld; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Complexities in Cancer Risk Counseling: Presentation of Three Cases.

Authors:  K A Schneider; J E Stopfer; J A Peters; E Knell; G Rosenthal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Incorporating a Psychological Counselor in a Cancer Risk Assessment Program: Necessity, Acceptability, and Potential Roles.

Authors:  Alicia K Matthews; Dana L Brandenburg; Shelly Cummings; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  The Prophylactic Mastectomy Dilemma: A Support Group for Women at High Genetic Risk for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  J Karp; K L Brown; M D Sullivan; M J Massie
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  Clinical management of women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  V G Vogel; A Yeomans; E Higginbotham
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.