Literature DB >> 15660564

Relationship between outdoor and indoor air quality in eight French schools.

P Blondeau1, V Iordache, O Poupard, D Genin, F Allard.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In the frame of the French national research program PRIMEQUAL (inter-ministry program for better air quality in urban environments), measurements of outdoor and indoor pollution have been carried out in eight schools in La Rochelle (France) and its suburbs. The buildings were naturally ventilated by opening the windows, or mechanically ventilated, and showed various air permeabilities. Ozone, nitrogen oxides (NO and NO(2)), and airborne particle (particle counts within 15 size intervals ranging from 0.3 to 15 mum) concentrations were continuously monitored indoors and outdoors for two 2-week periods. The indoor humidity, temperature, CO(2) concentration (an indicator of occupancy), window openings and building permeability were also measured. The temporal profiles of indoor and outdoor concentrations show ozone and nitrogen oxides behave differently: NO and NO(2) indoor/outdoor concentration ratios (I/O) were found to vary in a range from 0.5 to 1, and from 0.88 to 1, respectively, but no correlation with building permeability was observed. On the contrary, I/O ratios of ozone vary in a range from 0 to 0.45 and seem to be strongly influenced by the building air-tightness: the more airtight the building envelope, the lower the ratio. Occupancy, through re-suspension of previously deposited particles and possible particle generation, strongly influences the indoor concentration level of airborne particles. However, this influence decreases with particle size, reflecting the way deposition velocities vary as a function of size. The influence of particle size on deposition and penetration across the building envelope is also discussed by analyzing the I/O ratios measured when the buildings were unoccupied, by comparing the indoor concentrations measured when the buildings were occupied and when they were not (O/U ratios), and by referring to previously published studies focussing on this topic. Except one case, I/O were found to vary in the range from 0.03 to 1.79. All O/U are greater than one and increase up to 100 with particle size. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Assessing children's total exposure requires the knowledge of outdoor and indoor air contaminant concentrations. The study presented here provides data on compared outdoor and indoor concentration levels in school buildings, as well as information on the parameters influencing the relationship between outdoor and indoor air quality. It may be used as a basis for estimating indoor concentrations from outdoor concentrations data, or as a first step in designing buildings sheltering children against atmospheric pollution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15660564     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00263.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  30 in total

1.  Indoor air quality differences between urban and rural preschools in Korea.

Authors:  Chungsik Yoon; Kiyoung Lee; Donguk Park
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Indoor and outdoor sources of size-resolved mass concentration of particulate matter in a school gym-implications for exposure of exercising children.

Authors:  Martin Braniš; Jiří Safránek; Adéla Hytychová
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Effect modification by community characteristics on the short-term effects of ozone exposure and mortality in 98 US communities.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Francesca Dominici
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Aerosol particles generated by diesel-powered school buses at urban schools as a source of children's exposure.

Authors:  Heather A Hochstetler; Mikhail Yermakov; Tiina Reponen; Patrick H Ryan; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Indoor air quality in elementary schools of Lisbon in spring.

Authors:  P N Pegas; C A Alves; M G Evtyugina; T Nunes; M Cerqueira; M Franchi; C A Pio; S M Almeida; M C Freitas
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Particle size distribution and air pollution patterns in three urban environments in Xi'an, China.

Authors:  Xinyi Niu; Benjamin Guinot; Junji Cao; Hongmei Xu; Jian Sun
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  Cytogenetic biomonitoring of primary school children exposed to air pollutants: micronuclei analysis of buccal epithelial cells.

Authors:  Gonca Çakmak Demircigil; Onur Erdem; Eftade O Gaga; Hicran Altuğ; Gülçin Demirel; Özlem Özden; Akif Arı; Sermin Örnektekin; Tuncay Döğeroğlu; Wim van Doorn; Sema Burgaz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Modeling of regional climate change effects on ground-level ozone and childhood asthma.

Authors:  Perry E Sheffield; Kim Knowlton; Jessie L Carr; Patrick L Kinney
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Modeling indoor particulate exposures in inner-city school classrooms.

Authors:  Jonathan M Gaffin; Carter R Petty; Marissa Hauptman; Choong-Min Kang; Jack M Wolfson; Yara Abu Awad; Qian Di; Peggy S Lai; William J Sheehan; Sachin Baxi; Brent A Coull; Joel D Schwartz; Diane R Gold; Petros Koutrakis; Wanda Phipatanakul
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 5.563

10.  Assessment of indoor and outdoor PM species at schools and residences in a high-altitude Ecuadorian urban center.

Authors:  Amit U Raysoni; Rodrigo X Armijos; M Margaret Weigel; Teresa Montoya; Patricia Eschanique; Marcia Racines; Wen-Whai Li
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 8.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.