Literature DB >> 20972889

Indoor and outdoor sources of size-resolved mass concentration of particulate matter in a school gym-implications for exposure of exercising children.

Martin Braniš1, Jiří Safránek, Adéla Hytychová.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It has been noticed many times that schools are buildings with high levels of particulate matter concentrations. Several authors documented that concentrations of particulate matter in indoor school microenvironments exceed limits recommended by WHO namely when school buildings are situated near major roads with high traffic densities. In addition, exercise under conditions of high particulate concentrations may increase the adverse health effects, as the total particle deposition increases in proportion to minute ventilation, and the deposition fraction nearly doubles from rest to intense exercise. SITE AND METHODS: Mass concentrations of size-segregated aerosol were measured simultaneously in an elementary school gym and an adjacent outdoor site in the central part of Prague by two pairs of collocated aerosol monitors-a fast responding photometer DusTrak and a five stage cascade impactor. To encompass seasonal and annual differences, 89 days of measurements were performed during ten campaigns between 2005 and 2009. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The average (all campaigns) outdoor concentration of PM(2.5) (28.3 μg m(-3)) measured by the cascade impactors was higher than the indoor value (22.3 μg m(-3)) and the corresponding average from the nearest fixed site monitor (23.6 μg m(-3)). Indoor and outdoor PM(2.5) concentrations exceeded the WHO recommended 24-h limit in 42% and 49% of the days measured, respectively. The correlation coefficient (r) between corresponding outdoor and indoor aerosol sizes increased with decreasing aerodynamic diameter of the collected particles (r = 0.32-0.87), suggesting a higher infiltration rate of fine and quasi-ultrafine particles. Principal component analysis revealed five factors explaining more than 82% of the data variability. The first two factors reflected a close association between outdoor and indoor fine and quasi-ultrafine particles confirming the hypothesis of high infiltration rate of particles from outdoors. The third factor indicated that human activity is the main source of indoor emission of coarse particles. The fourth factor involved only outdoor variables showing the resuspension of coarse ambient aerosol on dry and warm days without its seeming effect on the indoor coarse PM levels. Having in mind that high concentrations of both fine and coarse aerosol were frequently observed in the studied space, our results suggest that indoor exercise in polluted urbanized areas may increase the overall exposure and thus represent a potential health risk to young individuals during physical education at schools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20972889     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-010-0405-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  26 in total

Review 1.  The public health relevance of air pollution abatement.

Authors:  N Künzli
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 16.671

2.  An exposure assessment of PM10 from a major highway interchange: are children in nearby schools at risk?

Authors:  Steven Korenstein; Bill Piazza
Journal:  J Environ Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.179

3.  Proximity of schools in Detroit, Michigan to automobile and truck traffic.

Authors:  Yi-Chen Wu; Stuart A Batterman
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Air pollution, exercise, and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Murray A Mittleman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Particle size distribution and composition in a mechanically ventilated school building during air pollution episodes.

Authors:  J L Parker; R R Larson; E Eskelson; E M Wood; J M Veranth
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 5.770

6.  Large particles are responsible for elevated bacterial marker levels in school air upon occupation.

Authors:  Alvin Fox; William Harley; Charles Feigley; Deborah Salzberg; Charlotte Toole; Aleksandra Sebastian; Lennart Larsson
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2005-03-29

7.  Assessment of physical education time and after-school outdoor time in elementary and middle school students in south Mexico City: the dilemma between physical fitness and the adverse health effects of outdoor pollutant exposure.

Authors:  Anna Villarreal-Calderón; Hilda Acuña; Jessica Villarreal-Calderón; Mónica Garduño; Carlos F Henríquez-Roldán; Lilian Calderón-Garcidueñas; Gildardo Valencia-Salazar
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct

8.  Analysis of trace elements and ions in ambient fine particulate matter at three elementary schools in Ohio.

Authors:  Kuruvilla John; Saritha Karnae; Kevin Crist; Myoungwoo Kim; Amol Kulkarni
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.235

9.  Exposure to ultrafine particles from ambient air and oxidative stress-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Elvira Vaclavik Bräuner; Lykke Forchhammer; Peter Møller; Jacob Simonsen; Marianne Glasius; Peter Wåhlin; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Steffen Loft
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Proximity of California public schools to busy roads.

Authors:  Rochelle S Green; Svetlana Smorodinsky; Janice J Kim; Robert McLaughlin; Bart Ostro
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  4 in total

1.  Indoor and outdoor particulate matter in primary school classrooms with fan-assisted natural ventilation in Singapore.

Authors:  Ailu Chen; Elliott T Gall; Victor W C Chang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Association of Urinary Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Diabetes in Korean Adults: Data from the Korean National Environmental Health Survey Cycle 2 (2012-2014).

Authors:  Yon Ju Nam; Shin-Hye Kim
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.168

3.  Particulate matter in the indoor and outdoor air of a gymnasium and a fronton.

Authors:  Célia Alves; Ana I Calvo; Liliana Marques; Amaya Castro; Teresa Nunes; Esther Coz; Roberto Fraile
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Five Year Trends of Particulate Matter Concentrations in Korean Regions (2015-2019): When to Ventilate?

Authors:  Dohyeong Kim; Hee-Eun Choi; Won-Mo Gal; SungChul Seo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.