Literature DB >> 20668959

Indoor air quality differences between urban and rural preschools in Korea.

Chungsik Yoon1, Kiyoung Lee, Donguk Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIMS, AND SCOPE: Preschool indoor air quality (IAQ) is believed to be different from elementary school or higher school IAQ and preschool is the first place for social activity. Younger children are more susceptible than higher-grade children and spend more time indoors. The purpose of this study was to compare the indoor air quality by investigating the concentrations of airborne particulates and gaseous materials at preschools in urban and rural locations in Korea.
METHODS: We investigated the concentrations of airborne particulates and gaseous materials in 71 classrooms at 17 Korean preschools. For comparison, outdoor air was sampled simultaneously with indoor air samples. Airborne concentrations of total suspended particulates, respirable particulates, lead, asbestos, total volatile organic compounds and components, formaldehyde, and CO(2) were measured with National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and/or Environmental Protection Agency analytical methods.
RESULTS: The concentration profiles of the investigated pollutants in indoor and urban settings were higher than those in outdoor and rural areas, respectively. The ratios of indoor/outdoor concentrations (I/O) of particulates and gaseous pollutants were characterized in urban and rural preschools. Total dust concentration was highest in urban indoor settings followed by urban outdoor, rural indoor, and rural outdoor locations with an I/O ratio of 1.37 in urban and 1.35 in rural areas. Although I/O ratios of lead were close to 1, lead concentrations were much higher in urban than in rural areas. The I/O ratio of total VOCs was 2.29 in urban and 2.52 in rural areas, with the highest level in urban indoor settings. The I/O ratio of formaldehyde concentrations was higher in rural than in urban areas because the outdoor rural level was much lower than the urban concentration. Since an I/O ratio higher than 1 implies the presence of indoor sources, we concluded that there are many indoor sources in preschools.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that pollutants in indoor and urban settings were higher than those in outdoor and rural areas, respectively. Preschool children are expected to spend more time inside preschool facilities and therefore to be more exposed to pollutants. As far as we know, preschool IAQ is different from elementary school or higher school IAQ. Also, they are more vulnerable than higher-grade children. We found that the indoor and urban concentration profiles of the studied pollutants in preschools were higher than those in outdoor and rural areas. We believe that our findings may be useful for understanding the potential health effects of exposure and intervention studies in preschools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20668959     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-010-0377-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  30 in total

1.  Would removing indoor air particulates in children's environments reduce rate of absenteeism--a hypothesis.

Authors:  K G Rosén; G Richardson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1999-08-30       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Volatile organic compounds concentrations in residential indoor and outdoor and its personal exposure in Korea.

Authors:  Busoon Son; Patrick Breysse; Wonho Yang
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Respiratory symptoms, asthma and allergen levels in schools--comparison between Korea and Sweden.

Authors:  J L Kim; L Elfman; D Norbäck
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.770

4.  The difficulties with low-level asbestos exposure assessments in public, commercial, and industrial buildings.

Authors:  D G Howitt; J Hatfield; G Fishler
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1993-05

5.  Mass concentrations of airborne asbestos in the non-occupational environment--a preliminary report of U.K. measurements.

Authors:  G J Burdett; J M le Guen; A P Rood
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1984

Review 6.  Do indoor pollutants and thermal conditions in schools influence student performance? A critical review of the literature.

Authors:  M J Mendell; G A Heath
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.770

7.  Laboratory and field validation of the GC-NPD method for the measurement of formaldehyde in the workplace.

Authors:  Jee Yeon Jeong; Nam Won Paik
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Associations between indoor CO2 concentrations and sick building syndrome symptoms in U.S. office buildings: an analysis of the 1994-1996 BASE study data.

Authors:  M G Apte; W J Fisk; J M Daisey
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.770

9.  Comparison of outdoor and indoor mobile source-related volatile organic compounds between low- and high-floor apartments.

Authors:  Wan-Kuen Jo; Ki-Young Kim; Kun-Ho Park; Yoo-Keun Kim; Hwa-Woon Lee; Jong-Kil Park
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Day-care attendance and increased risk for respiratory and allergic symptoms in preschool age.

Authors:  L Hagerhed-Engman; C-G Bornehag; J Sundell; N Aberg
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 13.146

View more
  10 in total

1.  Assessment of formaldehyde levels in relation to respiratory and allergic symptoms in children from Alba County schools, Romania.

Authors:  Iulia A Neamtiu; Shao Lin; Menglan Chen; Carmen Roba; Eva Csobod; Eugen S Gurzau
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Volatile organic compounds and bioaerosols in the vicinity of a municipal waste organic fraction treatment plant. Human health risks.

Authors:  Lolita Vilavert; Martí Nadal; María J Figueras; José L Domingo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The relationship between solvent use and BTEX concentrations in occupational environments.

Authors:  Eduardo Monteiro Martins; Priscila Falcão de Sá Borba; Neemias Espindola Dos Santos; Paula Thaise Bermudez Dos Reis; Renata Simões Silveira; Sergio Machado Corrêa
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Children exposure to indoor ultrafine particles in urban and rural school environments.

Authors:  João Cavaleiro Rufo; Joana Madureira; Inês Paciência; Klara Slezakova; Maria do Carmo Pereira; Lívia Aguiar; João Paulo Teixeira; André Moreira; Eduardo Oliveira Fernandes
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Indoor Air Quality and Respiratory Health among Malay Preschool Children in Selangor.

Authors:  Nur Azwani Mohd Nor Rawi; Juliana Jalaludin; Poh Choo Chua
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Indoor Air Quality in Urban and Rural Preschools in Upper Silesia, Poland: Particulate Matter and Carbon Dioxide.

Authors:  Anna Mainka; Elwira Zajusz-Zubek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  PM2.5 in Urban and Rural Nursery Schools in Upper Silesia, Poland: Trace Elements Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Mainka; Elwira Zajusz-Zubek; Konrad Kaczmarek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Indoor Particulate Matters, Microbial Count Assessments, and Wheezing Symptoms among Toddlers in Urban Day Care Centers in the District of Seremban, Malaysia.

Authors:  Raihan Khamal; Zaleha Md Isa; Rosnah Sutan; Nor Mohd Razif Noraini; Hasanain Faisal Ghazi
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 2.462

Review 9.  Indoor Air Quality in Buildings: A Comprehensive Review on the Factors Influencing Air Pollution in Residential and Commercial Structure.

Authors:  Mehzabeen Mannan; Sami G Al-Ghamdi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Airborne bioaerosols and their impact on human health.

Authors:  Ki-Hyun Kim; Ehsanul Kabir; Shamin Ara Jahan
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 5.565

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.