| Literature DB >> 15660156 |
Derrick E Fouts1, Emmanuel F Mongodin, Robert E Mandrell, William G Miller, David A Rasko, Jacques Ravel, Lauren M Brinkac, Robert T DeBoy, Craig T Parker, Sean C Daugherty, Robert J Dodson, A Scott Durkin, Ramana Madupu, Steven A Sullivan, Jyoti U Shetty, Mobolanle A Ayodeji, Alla Shvartsbeyn, Michael C Schatz, Jonathan H Badger, Claire M Fraser, Karen E Nelson.
Abstract
Sequencing and comparative genome analysis of four strains of Campylobacter including C. lari RM2100, C. upsaliensis RM3195, and C. coli RM2228 has revealed major structural differences that are associated with the insertion of phage- and plasmid-like genomic islands, as well as major variations in the lipooligosaccharide complex. Poly G tracts are longer, are greater in number, and show greater variability in C. upsaliensis than in the other species. Many genes involved in host colonization, including racR/S, cadF, cdt, ciaB, and flagellin genes, are conserved across the species, but variations that appear to be species specific are evident for a lipooligosaccharide locus, a capsular (extracellular) polysaccharide locus, and a novel Campylobacter putative licABCD virulence locus. The strains also vary in their metabolic profiles, as well as their resistance profiles to a range of antibiotics. It is evident that the newly identified hypothetical and conserved hypothetical proteins, as well as uncharacterized two-component regulatory systems and membrane proteins, may hold additional significant information on the major differences in virulence among the species, as well as the specificity of the strains for particular hosts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15660156 PMCID: PMC539331 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Biol ISSN: 1544-9173 Impact factor: 8.029
Genome Features of Five Campylobacter Genomes
a MLST and complex designations follow the PubMLST Web site (http://pubmlst.org/) [101]
b FlaA SVR (http://phoenix.medawar.ox.ac.uk/flaA/) [34,102]
c Estimate (number based on manual inspection of only a subset of genes)
d From [28]
e Disrupted ORF
f Contingency gene present
g Based on TIGR role category
h See Table S10 for gene lists
MOMP, major outer membrane protein
Figure 1Whole-Genome Comparison of Five Campylobacter Strains
Line figures depict the results of PROmer analysis. Colored lines denote percent identity of protein translations and are plotted according to the location in the reference (C. jejuni RM1221, x-axis) and query genomes (C. jejuni NCTC 11168 [upper y-axis] and C. coli RM2228 [lower y-axis]) (A). The Venn diagrams show the number of proteins shared (black) or unique (red) within a particular relationship for all five Campylobacter strains (B) and for members of the sequenced ɛ-Proteobacteria compared in this study (C). Protein sequences binned as “unique” are unique within the context of the genomes plotted and the cutoffs used to parse the BLASTP data. The pie charts plot the number of protein sequences by main functional role categories for C. jejuni RM1221 ORFs. A frequency distribution of protein percent identity (D) was computed: specifically, the number of protein sequences within class intervals of 5% amino acid identity from 35% to 100% that match C. jejuni RM1221 reference sequences were plotted.
Figure 2Phylogenetic Analysis and Frequency Distribution of Protein Percent Identity
Concensus maximum-likelihood trees are depicted using multiple alignments of 16S rRNA (A) or 12 concatenated protein datasets (B). The numbers along the branches denote percent occurrence of nodes among 100 bootstrap replicates. The scale bar represents the number of nucleotide (A) or amino acid (B) substitutions.
Figure 3Linear Representations of Prophage Regions
Regions are (from top to bottom): CMLP1, CJIE2, CJIE4, CLIE1, and CUIE1. Colors of ORFs are indicated in the key by putative phage function. Connecting lines represent those ORFs whose protein sequences match at a BLASTP of 30% identity or better. These lines do not indicate the coordinates of match, merely that there is a match.
Relevant Drug Resistance Profiles
a Resistance mechanism: CCOA0067/CCOA0068—aminoglycoside 3′-phosphotransferase from pCC178
b Sensitivity likely due to fragmentation of a class D β-lactamase
c Resistance mechanism: 23S rRNA (A2122G), corresponding to position 2,143 of H. pylori sequence [84]
d Resistance mechanism: T86V mutation in gyrA (CLA1521)
e Resistance mechanism: CCOA0206—tetracycline resistance protein (tetO) from pCC178
I, intermediate resistance; R, resistant; S, susceptible