Literature DB >> 9337164

Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality.

G B Hanna1, T G Frank, A Cuschieri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of the surgeon's skill and the ergonomics of task performance in endoscopic surgery can be based on knot-tying tasks. The aim of this study was to establish an objective method for assessing the quality of surgical knots for use in such studies.
METHODS: In all, 2,700 surgeon's endoscopic knots were studied. Each knot was distracted using a tensiometer, and a computerized system analyzed force-extension curves. The breaking force was taken as an index of knot strength while the force integrated over the slope of the curve reflected knot tightening. A knot quality score (KQS) was obtained from the product of the knot-breaking force and the integrated force expressed as a percentage of the product for the untied ligature.
RESULTS: The mean breaking force (24 Newton +/- 2.5) and integrated force (7.4 Newton +/- 2.8) for broken knots were 71% and 35%, respectively, of those for untied ligature. The integrated force yielded a narrower range of variability for untied ligature (SD 3.5% of mean) than for knots (SD 37% of mean). The KQS was higher for broken (25.3%+/-10.3%) than slipped knots (7.1%+/-5.1%).
CONCLUSION: The KQS provides a reliable assessment of knot security and reflects the strength and degree of tightening of the knot.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9337164     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00129-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  20 in total

1.  Motion analysis.

Authors:  S G T Smith; J Torkington; T J Brown; N J Taffinder; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Effect of the angle between the optical axis of the endoscope and the instruments' plane on monitor image and surgical performance.

Authors:  P V Patil; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery.

Authors:  Krishna Moorthy; Yaron Munz; Sudip K Sarker; Ara Darzi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-01

5.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery is associated with enhanced depth perception in novices.

Authors:  S Manasnayakorn; A Cuschieri; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Knotless choledochorraphy with barbed suture, safe and feasible.

Authors:  Luis C Fernandez; Augusto Toriz; Jorge Hernandez; Norberto Sanchez; Erick Linares; Massiel Zenteno; Adolfo Cuendis; Jose Olivares; Gustavo Guerrero; Cesar F Cervantes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Evaluation of the 10-year history of a 2-day standardized laparoscopic surgical skills training program at Kyushu University.

Authors:  Morimasa Tomikawa; Munenori Uemura; Hajime Kenmotsu; Kozo Konishi; Kenoki Ohuchida; Ken Okazaki; Satoshi Ieiri; Kazuo Tanoue; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training.

Authors:  Anthony G Gallagher; E Matt Ritter; Howard Champion; Gerald Higgins; Marvin P Fried; Gerald Moses; C Daniel Smith; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Influence of instrument size on endoscopic task performance in pediatric intracorporeal knot tying: smaller instruments are better in infants.

Authors:  Alex C H Lee; Munther J Haddad; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Training on a vascular interventional simulator: an observational study.

Authors:  Darren Klass; Matthew D B S Tam; John Cockburn; Stuart Williams; Andoni P Toms
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.