Literature DB >> 15623490

Mitochondrial DNA haplotyping revealed the presence of mixed up benign and neoplastic tissue sections from two individuals on the same prostatic biopsy slide.

A Alonso1, C Alves, M P Suárez-Mier, C Albarrán, L Pereira, L Fernández de Simón, P Martín, O García, L Gusmão, M Sancho, A Amorim.   

Abstract

DNA typing was requested to investigate a presumptive cancer diagnosis error by confirming whether benign and cancerous prostatic tissue in the same presurgical haematoxylin and eosin stained slide belonged to the same person. After independent histological re-examination of the slide by a pathologist, manual slide dissection was used to guarantee independent and high recovery DNA isolation from each tissue section, avoiding carryover and background contamination. Nuclear DNA quantification performed by real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) revealed the absence of human DNA for short tandem repeat (STR) typing. Mitochondrial DNA was only obtained by performing PCR of very short fragments ( approximately 100 bp), indicating high DNA degradation. Different low frequency hypervariable region I haplotypes were obtained from each tissue section (normal tissue section haplotype: 16224C, 16234T, 16311C, 16356C; cancer tissue section haplotype: 16256T, 16270T, 16293G). Only the normal tissue section haplotype matched that obtained from the patient's blood sample, indicating that the cancer tissue section originated from an unknown patient. These results supported the hypothesis of sample mix up during block processing or slide preparation by a carryover mechanism. Mitochondrial genetic typing is recommended to exclude the possibility of carryover artefacts when low DNA content and high degradation compromise conventional STR typing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15623490      PMCID: PMC1770540          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2004.017673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  11 in total

Review 1.  Errors in histopathology reporting: detection and avoidance.

Authors:  A D Ramsay
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Application of short tandem repeat of genomic DNA and mitochondrial DNA for identification of mixed-up tissue specimens.

Authors:  K Sano; K Takayanagi; T Kaneko; C Liu; T Kinoshita; N Nakamura; H Asamura; M Ito; H Fukushima; M Hotchi
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.534

Review 3.  Application of low copy number DNA profiling.

Authors:  P Gill
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.351

4.  A microdissection and molecular genotyping assay to confirm the identity of tissue floaters in paraffin-embedded tissue blocks.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hunt; Patricia Swalsky; E Sasatomi; Laura Niehouse; Anke Bakker; Sydney D Finkelstein
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  A rapid chemiluminescent method for quantitation of human DNA.

Authors:  P S Walsh; J Varlaro; R Reynolds
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Application of forensic identity testing in a clinical setting. Specimen identification.

Authors:  G J Tsongalis; M M Berman
Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol       Date:  1997-04

7.  Identity testing in cervical carcinoma in case of suspected mix-up.

Authors:  L C Horn; J Edelmann; C Hänel; U Fischer; A Müller; M Höckel
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  Validation of mitochondrial DNA sequencing for forensic casework analysis.

Authors:  M R Wilson; J A DiZinno; D Polanskey; J Replogle; B Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  S Anderson; A T Bankier; B G Barrell; M H de Bruijn; A R Coulson; J Drouin; I C Eperon; D P Nierlich; B A Roe; F Sanger; P H Schreier; A J Smith; R Staden; I G Young
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Real-time PCR designs to estimate nuclear and mitochondrial DNA copy number in forensic and ancient DNA studies.

Authors:  Antonio Alonso; Pablo Martín; Cristina Albarrán; Pilar García; Oscar García; Lourdes Fernández de Simón; Julia García-Hirschfeld; Manuel Sancho; Concepción de La Rúa; Jose Fernández-Piqueras
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  6 in total

1.  Contamination of histology biopsy specimen - a potential source of error for surgeons: a case report.

Authors:  Neil G Burke; D McCaffrey; E Mackle
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-09-09

Review 2.  Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers in cancer : improving diagnosis, risk assessment, and disease stratification.

Authors:  Mukesh Verma; Daniela Seminara; Fernando J Arena; Christy John; Kumiko Iwamoto; Virginia Hartmuller
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Malignant tumors and forensics--dilemmas and proposals.

Authors:  Zoran Budimlija; Connie Lu; Grace Axler-DiPerte; Jessica Seifarth; Dorota Popiolek; Franz Fogt; Mechthild Prinz
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.351

4.  SASI-Seq: sample assurance Spike-Ins, and highly differentiating 384 barcoding for Illumina sequencing.

Authors:  Michael A Quail; Miriam Smith; David Jackson; Steven Leonard; Thomas Skelly; Harold P Swerdlow; Yong Gu; Peter Ellis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Contamination and sample mix-up can best explain some patterns of mtDNA instabilities in buccal cells and oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Bandelt; Antonio Salas
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  External contamination in single cell mtDNA analysis.

Authors:  Yong-Gang Yao; Hans-Jürgen Bandelt; Neal S Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.