Literature DB >> 15621179

"Crowding" in normal and amblyopic vision assessed with Gaussian and Gabor C's.

Srividhya Hariharan1, Dennis M Levi, Stanley A Klein.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent and specificity of crowding in the normal fovea and periphery, and the central field of amblyopes, using "C"-like patterns. In the first experiment we measured the extent of crowding for C-patterns comprised of Gaussian patches, over a range of target sizes using a four-alternative forced-choice (up, down, left, right) method. We found that the extent of foveal crowding is proportional to target size. In contrast, in normal periphery and in the central field of amblyopes, crowding extends over large spatial distances and is not size dependent. Crowding for our stimuli occurred with both same-polarity and opposite polarity patches. To test whether the extended crowding in amblyopia resulted from a shift in the spatial scale of analysis, we measured crowding with band-limited C-patterns (comprised of Gabor patches) in a gap localization task (2-AFC). With band-limited stimuli, and a task that does not involve judging the orientation of the gap, the amblyopic eyes showed crowding over a longer distance than that of normal observers. We also tested the orientation specificity of crowding by varying the orientation of the flanks. In normal fovea, crowding is orientation specific: in amblyopia it is not. While crowding in normal fovea can be explained by simple pattern masking, crowding seen in normal periphery and amblyopes cannot. Instead we suggest that crowding in amblyopic and peripheral vision is a result of extended pooling at a stage following the stage of feature detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15621179     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  27 in total

1.  Global contour processing in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Cong Yu; Shu-Guang Kuai; Elizabeth Rislove
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision.

Authors:  C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-01

Review 3.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Contour interaction under photopic and scotopic conditions.

Authors:  Lenka Musilová; František Pluhácek; Stephanie M Marten-Ellis; Harold E Bedell; John Siderov
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  How do flanking objects affect reaching and grasping behavior in participants with macular disorders?

Authors:  Shahina Pardhan; Carmen Gonzalez-Alvarez; Ahalya Subramanian; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening.

Authors:  Shuang Song; Dennis M Levi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Perceptual learning reduces crowding in amblyopia and in the normal periphery.

Authors:  Zahra Hussain; Ben S Webb; Andrew T Astle; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Factors affecting crowded acuity: eccentricity and contrast.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Jeremy M Chin; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Foveal contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system.

Authors:  Marina V Danilova; Valeria M Bondarko
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Crowding during restricted and free viewing.

Authors:  Julian M Wallace; Michael K Chiu; Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.