Literature DB >> 17223155

Global contour processing in amblyopia.

Dennis M Levi1, Cong Yu, Shu-Guang Kuai, Elizabeth Rislove.   

Abstract

The purpose of the experiments described here was to investigate global image processing using methods that require global processing while eliminating or compensating for low level abnormalities: visibility, shape perception and positional uncertainty. In order to accomplish this we used a closed figure made up of Gabor patches either in noise or on a blank field. The stimuli were circular or elliptical contours, formed by N equally spaced Gabor patches. We performed two separate experiments: In one experiment we fixed N and varied the aspect ratio using a staircase to determine the threshold aspect ratio; in the second experiment we held the aspect ratio constant (at twice the threshold aspect ratio) and varied N in order to measure the threshold number of elements required to judge the shape. Our results confirm and extend previous studies showing that humans with naturally occurring amblyopia show deficits in contour processing. Our results show that the deficits depend strongly on spatial scale (target size and spatial frequency). The deficit in global contour processing is substantially greater in noise (where contour-linking is required) than on a blank field. The magnitude of the deficits is modest when low-level deficits (reduced visibility, increased positional uncertainty, and abnormal shape perception) are minimized, and does not seem to depend much on acuity, crowding or stereoacuity. The residual deficits reported here cannot be simply ascribed to reduced visibility or increased positional uncertainty, and we therefore conclude that these are genuine deficits in global contour segregation and integration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17223155      PMCID: PMC1851910          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  53 in total

1.  Sparse-sampling of gratings in the visual cortex of strabismic amblyopes.

Authors:  V Sharma; D M Levi; N J Coletta
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  A new test of contour integration deficits in patients with a history of disrupted binocular experience during visual development.

Authors:  I Kovács; U Polat; P M Pennefather; A Chandna; A M Norcia
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance.

Authors:  W S Geisler; J S Perry; B J Super; D P Gallogly
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Contour integration deficits in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  A Chandna; P M Pennefather; I Kovács; A M Norcia
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Detecting disorder in spatial vision.

Authors:  D M Levi; S A Klein; V Sharma; L Nguyen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Collinear interactions and contour integration.

Authors:  U Polat; Y Bonneh
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2000

7.  Learning to see: experience and attention in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  R E Crist; W Li; C D Gilbert
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Amblyopic deficits in detecting a dotted line in noise.

Authors:  A J Mussap; D M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Amblyopes see true alignment where normal observers see illusory tilt.

Authors:  A V Popple; D M Levi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Constant contour integration in peripheral vision for stimuli with good Gestalt properties.

Authors:  Shu-Guang Kuai; Cong Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Scale-dependent loss of global form perception in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Rislove; Elaine C Hall; Kara A Stavros; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Altered functional interactions between neurons in primary visual cortex of macaque monkeys with experimental amblyopia.

Authors:  Katerina Acar; Lynne Kiorpes; J Anthony Movshon; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Characteristics of fixational eye movements in amblyopia: Limitations on fixation stability and acuity?

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Girish Kumar; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Attention deficits in Amblyopia.

Authors:  Preeti Verghese; Suzanne P McKee; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-03-22

6.  A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening.

Authors:  Shuang Song; Dennis M Levi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Endogenous attention improves perception in amblyopic macaques.

Authors:  Amelie Pham; Marisa Carrasco; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Arthur Bradley; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 21.198

9.  Linking structure and function: development of lateral spatial interactions in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Da-Peng Li; Maureen A Hagan; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Image segregation in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.